- 1. [Tigers] Value Debate (score: 1)
- Author: "Steinman, Bill" <wsteinman@pogolaw.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:09:56 -0400
- Here's a question that has occured to me concerning the discussion of value. I'm curious how people think of their Tigers. For me, the Tiger is a little British sports car, and its primary competiton
- /html/tigers/2007-08/msg00028.html (7,831 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Value Debate (score: 1)
- Author: <awtiger@cox.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:48:42 -0400
- I, too, look at my Tiger as primarily a LBC first, just with a more powerful engine. I used to own a '65 Shelby G.T. 350 and had a ball with the car, but the Tiger to me is twice as much fun. Whereev
- /html/tigers/2007-08/msg00029.html (8,032 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Value Debate (score: 1)
- Author: "Cullen McCann" <CMcCann@lwpb.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:01:56 -0500
- This is interesting that it generates so much discussion. I was fascinated by Tigers originally due to the Shelby connection, because from a young age the Cobra was the paramount dream car. .... So I
- /html/tigers/2007-08/msg00033.html (8,808 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Value Debate (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris and Jodie" <cjcoffel@sonic.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:18:11 -0700
- To my kids it's like Dad owns Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. We only drive the Tiger for fun. Who cares about values. I like the fact most people don't know what it is. I think if they blew up like Shelbys
- /html/tigers/2007-08/msg00035.html (7,038 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu