Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+bumper\s+over\-riders\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+bumper\s+over\-riders\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] bumper over-riders (score: 1): Author: Rollright@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:32:18 EST; I got a set of bumpers chromed recently, and now am addressing the over-riders In the Alpine parts list there are two listed: 2226483 and 5115347 and from the outside they look identical. The 222648; /html/tigers/2010-12/msg00115.html (7,314 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] bumper over-riders (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:36:08 +1100; Cant say which tigers used what number, but... i assume the numbers both relate to the later style with rubber insert, these started on the SIV alpines, which were the first to move away from the or; /html/tigers/2010-12/msg00116.html (8,221 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] bumper over-riders (score: 1): Author: garywinblad@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:34:01 +0000 (UTC); B9470622 still has its original bumpers. The over-riders are like you describe 2226483 style. Gary Hello, I got a set of bumpers chromed recently, and now am addressing the over-riders In the Alpine; /html/tigers/2010-12/msg00117.html (7,336 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] bumper over-riders (score: 1): Author: "bob webb" <bobjeanbeams@roadrunner.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:37:08 -0500; the change was probably one of chrysler's ongoing changes to different vendors with a possible cost decrease. there were several vendor changes for parts for the series 5 alpine thru out the producti; /html/tigers/2010-12/msg00122.html (9,720 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] bumper over-riders (score: 1): Author: Rollright@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:41:27 EST; Thanks for your thoughts. I'd bet it is as you suggest. In all likelihood we will never know for sure. Best holiday regards, Jim Armstrong In a message dated 12/24/2010 10:37:07 A.M. Eastern Standard; /html/tigers/2010-12/msg00123.html (10,065 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] bumper over-riders (score: 1): Author: Rollright@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:44:29 EST; Thanks Gary. Looks like that settles it. It was a running change and there are Tigers with the early (sturdier) type. I'm going with those. Jim Armstrong In a message dated 12/23/2010 9:34:13 P.M. Ea; /html/tigers/2010-12/msg00124.html (8,121 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]