Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+engine\s+ancillaries\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+engine\s+ancillaries\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: dhhall@bellsouth.net; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:17:15 +0000; My engine is at the shop, and I'd like some advice about ancillaries. My goal is a largely stock, or period available, with adequate power for touring, and good driveability. I have a Mk 1A, whose or; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00056.html (7,645 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: "Alvin Johnson" <twojohnsons@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:47:00 -0400; Hi Dave, Jeez--At least replace those tired old heads. There are some aftermarket iron ones around, or you can paint the aluminum ones. Aluminum heads give power & actually can run w/out knocking on; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00057.html (7,447 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:34:11 -0600; Are the original iron heads you're planning to keep, the 260 ones? You should be careful (CC the heads) to not end up with an unworkable high compression ratio. Either 260 or 289 heads will have 1.67; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00059.html (9,513 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:04:46 -0700; A partial reply to your questions. Do not forget to pay attention to the cooling system. It isn't adequate for the 260, much less a modified 289. Easy reference: http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00063.html (9,009 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: <e.coiner@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:55:35 -0700; I have a 500 cfm edelbrock on my nearly stock 260. It works great, good As others have said, if your 289 is a 6 bolt bellhousing design you will need to change bell housings and clutch slave cylinder; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00075.html (9,936 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:25:57 -0600; I would argue that changing to a low-inertia flywheel is an easy, safe, and relatively inexpensive way to improve the acceleration performance of the Tiger. Also, since it's inside the bellhousing, t; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00076.html (8,119 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:36:40 -0700; Racing is a great passion. Who can forget the thrill of a win for a running in last place to pull ahead of ALL the competition in the last run to the finish line, and *win* the race. Especially with; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00081.html (7,896 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:35:40 -0400; I posted this a few months ago when someone else asked for engine opinions. I have just over 9,500 miles on this rebuild, a 1000 of which were this last weekend in 95+ temps going to the Louisville; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00090.html (10,288 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:53:02 -0400; Sorry for the late comment. With aluminum heads, polishing and painting really negates much of the performance valve of the material. For higher compression aluminum heads should not be painted or po; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00109.html (8,809 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:21:16 -0700 (PDT); I'll bet it makes very little difference in the grand scheme of things if painted or polished, the cooling system takes the brunt of the BTU's out of the motor not the radiation from the surface of t; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00114.html (9,511 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:49:09 EDT; the cooling system takes the brunt of the BTU's out of the motor not the radiation from the surface of the heads. Right on Sandy! John Logan **Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's B; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00124.html (8,050 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:05:03 -0700; John, Sandy, and others, I have been glancing at this thread and something is missing here... data and analysis. There are three components to the cooling of the engine: conduction of the heat via th; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00128.html (10,227 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:19:00 -0700; Right on, Mayf, I am reminded of the Jaguar XK 120M at a Palm Springs race day Concour. It had the top brass tank stripped, and polished. Maybe a clear coat as well. Looked great, but the Jag cooling; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00133.html (9,280 bytes)
14. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:29:31 -0700; Yep, look at all the radiators... aren't they mostly black? And a thin coat of paint would seem to offer very little int he way of heat transfer resistance. Sean, you out there? How about doing a qui; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00135.html (10,016 bytes)
15. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:34:47 -0400; Painting aluminum with a black flat paint will change the emissivity and help with convective heat transfer. High performance air-cooled engines in aircraft and motorcycles have used this technique f; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00136.html (9,504 bytes)
16. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:58:36 -0700; As an after thought... why do we call automotive radiators radiators? Maybe we should be calling them "convectors", eh? _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.tea; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00137.html (9,401 bytes)
17. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:19:29 -0700 (PDT); That is exactly the discussion I'm looking for! I did poke around on the web and found a car craft article debunking the HP loss/gain in aluminum vs iron head in some ways, with dyno data and while i; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00138.html (9,899 bytes)
18. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:20:35 -0700 (PDT); If Car Craft ran the same compression in both engines, there should be no HP difference between the iron and alum heads... but the thing is, if all else is identicle, you can run higher compression w; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00144.html (10,100 bytes)
19. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: "Robert Palmer" <rpalmerbob@roadrunner.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:51:21 -0700; I'll weigh in with my $0.02. It's not really the compression ratio that's fundamentally related to horsepower, but absolute compression. For example, I think it's obvious that super/turbo charged mot; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00145.html (9,415 bytes)
20. Re: [Tigers] engine ancillaries (score: 1): Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:54:42 -0700 (PDT); It makes me feel good , just to be able to tell my friends that I know(in a direct and or an indirect manner) a BUNCH of smart guys and they are specially "Tiger" smart. Which makes them way smarter; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00146.html (11,196 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]