Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+flywheel\s+surprise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+flywheel\s+surprise\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: "Owain Lloyd" <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:58:46 +0100; i do apologize for the recent flood of incompetent questions! one day i promise to buy you all a beer.... i just checked my old flywheel and it turns out to be the 50oz" type from '82. my engine is a; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00094.html (7,478 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: "Bob Dixon" <bobdixon@frii.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:07:58 -0600; I'm just guessing, but I'm wondering if the flywheel change was at the same time as the firing order change for small block Fords? _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net htt; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00095.html (7,655 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: "Owain Lloyd" <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:12:07 +0100; it may have been, but if the engine was built up from scratch they could have used a cam with any firing order (i think there were 3 different stock ford configurations) and still used either style c; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00096.html (8,788 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:16:09 -0600; The engine designation change from 302 cubic inches to 5.0 litres was made at the same time (1979 model year) as the firing order and engine balance changes. So when you're building or rebuilding an; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00097.html (8,413 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: "Jerry" <JCMC2006@suddenlink.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:34:45 -0500; If you had a wrong weight flywheel the vibration would be tremendous, so it doesn't sound like that's the problem. He said to identify the proper crankshaft you have to drop the pan to see the stamp; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00098.html (9,331 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:23:51 -0400; Jerry has given you the best information. Here is some information I have but I can't confirm total accuracy. 5.0L counterweight change to 50 oz in 1985. Early crankshafts are marked 1M on the front; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00099.html (9,632 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:31:08 -0400; I left out some information here: The 1 part number on the balancer I have a reference to shows E4TE-6316-A3A. This is a 5.0L, 50 oz balancer part number. Ron Fraser ________________________________; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00100.html (7,076 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: "Owain Lloyd" <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:11:04 +0100; holy cow! i just checked my crank and its marked "2M" on the front counter weight which i understand is a 28oz crank. its had a 50oz flywheel on there since i bought the car 5000 miles ago! i'd bette; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00122.html (11,193 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: Gary Crandall <maliburevue@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:08:27 -0700 (PDT); Has the 28 0z. crank been rebalanced to 50 oz.? Does anyone on the Tiger list know if that is possible and if yes, what to look for, or if it was it done incorrectly? You may want to call an engine; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00125.html (8,433 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: "Owain Lloyd" <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:19:47 +0100; my supplier over here says its not possible to do that but there are some holes drilled in the crank weights and the vibrations were not terrible so i strongly suspect someone has tried that. i guess; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00126.html (9,044 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: "Owain Lloyd" <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:11:12 +0100; i think it makes sense to make sure its properly balanced while the engine is out. i'll send the crank, rods, pistons, flywheel, clutch and balancer to a place over here that will balance the assembl; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00127.html (10,108 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:08:21 -0400; It is normal for a crank to have drill marks; that is how Ford does there balancing, drilling out material and sometimes drilling and adding heavy metal for production balance procedures. Ron Fraser; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00129.html (10,576 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] flywheel surprise (score: 1): Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:54:07 -0700 (PDT); Owain- There is a Tiger restoration person in the UK. I would HOPE he would help you find the best places to have work done and at the cheapest rates- Im sure they see a Yank coming and take advantag; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00140.html (11,117 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]