Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+front\s+suspension\s+and\s+alignment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+front\s+suspension\s+and\s+alignment\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] front suspension and alignment (score: 1): Author: "Brad Huff" <huffb@southslope.net>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 20:17:44 -0500; Years ago when I went through my front suspension on my MK 1A, I relocated my upper a arm pivot points as was recommended for better cornering. The geometry would keep the tire footprint on the groun; /html/tigers/2010-05/msg00124.html (7,339 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] front suspension and alignment (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 11:00:21 -0400; Relocating the upper A arm was a trick Shelby American used on the Mustang to get more Neg camber for racing. Someone in the Tiger group did this same trick on the Tiger; STOA has it in their 1977 T; /html/tigers/2010-05/msg00127.html (10,099 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] front suspension and alignment (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 11:42:54 EDT; IMHO, the Tiger really NEEDS static camber in at least the -1.0 range, given its poor camber curve and Ackerman issues. What wears tires, in general, is extreme toe, as in dialing in toe out on the f; /html/tigers/2010-05/msg00128.html (10,764 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]