Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+more\s+cubes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+more\s+cubes\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] more cubes (score: 1): Author: "rande" <rande@thecia.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:20:25 -0500; "You could still find 260s in Fairlanes, Falcons, Rancheros and Comets in '65 and '66 until they ran out of them." If this was the case, I don't know how Ford/Mercury marketed them. According to the; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00319.html (8,369 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] more cubes (score: 1): Author: "jim" <jim@island.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:42:02 -0800; A little bit off the topic but my dad bought a new '68 Falcon Futura sports coupe with a 289 2v.... he also had a brochure for that model and it listed 2 v8 options... the 289 2v and the 302 4v ... c; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00320.html (9,060 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] more cubes (score: 1): Author: "Stu Brennan" <stubrennan@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:59:33 -0500; I thought I read somewhere that the 260's in Ford vehicles were a different block from the Tiger 260s. A different design, with the number of freeze plugs and the thin wall casting design being obvio; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00321.html (7,070 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] more cubes (score: 1): Author: "Teepen, Jere" <jteepen@usatoday.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:35:03 -0500; The 260 motors Rootes received are reported to have come from the Industrial Division of Ford (fact). It is reported that after Lord Rootes drove the Shelby 260 V-8 Alpine he called Henry Ford II to; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00322.html (8,235 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] more cubes (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:23:29 -0500; Jan 1963, Ford changed the design of the 221 and 260 block to conform with the 289's 7" mount pattern and the 3 freeze plugs on both sides. The 260 casting # for this block is C3OE-6015-B. I believe; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00324.html (9,193 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] more cubes (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:46:43 -0500; 1968 Ford was producing 289 engines at the Windsor plant and 302 engines at the Cleveland plant. This is also the year the Windsor plant transitioned from the 289 engine to the 351 engine. The 289 2; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00325.html (10,134 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] more cubes (score: 1): Author: "Jim" <jimmc13@hughes.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:18:13 -0600; I have been quietly reading the information of how Rootes came to obtain Ford engines for the Tiger project. I have reviewed Taylors book because I remembered that he had collected some data from For; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00340.html (9,754 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] more cubes (score: 1): Author: Tony McNulty <bamcnulty@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:48:04 -0500; Anybody forgeting about the Industrial Engines part of Ford vis a vis the 260 blocks? Just asking. _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/do; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00356.html (11,787 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]