Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+new\s+power\s+for\s+mustang\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+new\s+power\s+for\s+mustang\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] new power for mustang (score: 1): Author: Rollright@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:31:44 EST; This guy said a Ford V10 from Explorer isn't enough torque.... _http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tan k-engine/_ (http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-; /html/tigers/2007-11/msg00338.html (7,455 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] new power for mustang (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:39:04 -0700; Well it's definitely going to have the Hot Wheels monster-motor look. Needs zoomies. And a blower. Theo _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mai; /html/tigers/2007-11/msg00339.html (6,956 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] new power for mustang (score: 1): Author: Rollright@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:44:57 EST; Is there anything bigger than a GMC 6-71 blower? He does need it. It lack height................... Jim Armstrong Jim Armstrong MK 1A 382002083 Rollright@aol.com **Check out AOL's list of 2007's hott; /html/tigers/2007-11/msg00340.html (7,131 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] new power for mustang (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:00:06 -0700; Roots supercharger case sizes go up to 16-71... although GMC didn't ever make that size. http://www.racecarbook.com/articles/superchargers.shtml ________________________________ Is there anything big; /html/tigers/2007-11/msg00341.html (7,922 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] new power for mustang (score: 1): Author: "Robert Palmer" <rpalmerbob@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 14:55:18 -0800; I can't help but imagine how embarrassed he would be in a 1/4 mile matchup with this Acura RX that puts out 570 HP at 8,000 rpm. What matters is torque at the rear wheels, not the engine, and that's; /html/tigers/2007-12/msg00008.html (8,776 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]