Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+the\s+Mk\s+2\s+thread\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+the\s+Mk\s+2\s+thread\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] the Mk 2 thread (score: 1): Author: "rande" <rande@thecia.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:19:44 -0400; Maybe I'm confused. Is all this discussion about a MK 2 based on the Denis Facebook pictures showing what looks like a Mark 1 / Mark 1A and is this the car that some of the doubt is about? __________; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00059.html (6,757 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] the Mk 2 thread (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <slaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:01:27 -0700; It is all MY fault. I never knew that the Mk II trunk design was changed from prior Tigers. It went from a bolted plate retainer to a "Y"" shaped belt tie-down, just exactly as Jim Sencindiver has d; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00060.html (8,051 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] the Mk 2 thread (score: 1): Author: "denis mercier" <denismercier@telvic.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 18:15:37 -0400; Rande and All... There is some difference between the MK1A and MKII trunk configuration, on MK1A the spare tire his hold in place by a bolt screwn on a special nut welded on the trunk, on MKII the sp; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00061.html (8,614 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] the Mk 2 thread (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 09:38:44 +1000; I guess this muist have got lost in the previous thread.. but this is a MKII boot (trunk) including the tool roll etc.. http://www.sunbeamtiger.co.uk/Galleries/Classfieds/B382100605/images/13.JPG --; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00063.html (7,016 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]