Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+tiger\s+blocks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+tiger\s+blocks\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: "Clyde McLaughlin" <clydemclaughlin@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:29:13 -0500; Yes, the 260 tiger blocks had three freeze plugs like a 289, other Fords with 260's had two freeze plugs on the each side of the block, Clyde _______________________________________________ Tigers@au; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00335.html (6,651 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: David or Gary Franchi <wwwdg@webtv.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:10:10 GMT; Thought this site might be of interest in the Tiger freeze plug discussion. If he is correct, all 260's have three freeze plugs. David Franchi http://www.falconparts.com/early%20v-8%20engine%20mounts; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00375.html (8,047 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:25:22 -0800; Danger, Will RObinson..danger danger... the first paragraph contains an error error.... the 289 block and 302 block both have 4 inch bores You caninfact make a 302 by using the 302 crank and rods and; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00376.html (9,262 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:39:14 -0500; The early 221 block have a casting # C2OE-6015-G and the early 260 block, casting # C2OE-6015-J located on top behind the intake manifold. These 2 blocks have 6" mounts with 2 freeze plugs. Jan 1963; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00378.html (9,867 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: "jim" <jim@island.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:57:08 -0800; Ya... I noticed that too about the bore sizes...a 302 is a stroked 289 ... I don't remember much about my first Tiger from the seventies except it did have a 260 when I bought it... Of course the fir; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00380.html (9,059 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: "A. C. Tynes" <v8tracker@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:02:29 -0600; It is true that a 302 is a stroked 289 and that the internals of one block will fit the other. However, the cylinder bores are slightly longer in the 302 blocks to accommodate the longer stroke and r; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00383.html (10,204 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: Gary <maliburevue@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:45:48 -0800 (PST); I agree with the freeze plug and motor mount spacing information, but the author is incorrect in the first paragraph where is states "the 289 can not be bored out for fitment of the 302 pistons." The; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00384.html (9,422 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:52:17 -0800; I think there may be a number of folk running 302 internals in their 289 blocks. The differences are very small as I understand. The note I sent was because the reference item sent said that the 289; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00385.html (12,344 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:06:39 +1100; As May F posted a little later, the diffeence between the 289 and 302 may not be that much, perhaps ford being cautious.. but lets go with they did it for a good reason.. Lets say running the 302 cra; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00396.html (12,961 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: "Dave Munroe" <dave@munroe.ca>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:59:36 -0400; Hi Michael: I have the 331 stroker kit in my 289 Block, with approximately 12,000 miles on it now with no mechanical issues. It suffered serious elevated heat abuse after its original build by an ine; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00398.html (9,589 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:42:16 -0800; forgot to delete the trailer... First things first... I am not "may f ", lol... Not pronounced May then an added F. It is just a contraction of my last name first 4 letters. Pronounce it like "Mayfph; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00399.html (11,546 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: "Teepen, Jere" <jteepen@usatoday.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:07:19 -0500; Lots of folks have built stroked 289 motors. The cylinder skirts are not significantly longer between the 289 and 302. If there was a problem stroking 289 blocks we would have heard about it. To date; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00402.html (12,583 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: "Rense, Mark (GE, Appl & Light)" <mark.rense@ge.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:13:51 -0500; You are correct. When Ford added a little meat to the bottoms of the cylinders for the extra .130" of stroke in the 302, it was to basically keep those long skirt pistons from slapping when they wer; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00404.html (9,540 bytes)
14. Re: [Tigers] tiger blocks (score: 1): Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:52:42 -0500; Larry was kind enough to correct my math... The difference in stroke is just a tad more then 1/8". Sorry! Tom _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00406.html (8,645 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]