Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+tiger\s+originality\s+\/\s+authenticity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+tiger\s+originality\s+\/\s+authenticity\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: kennon1@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:25:49 -0400; Hello all, When is a tiger not a tiger....is a rear clip ok?..........is a front clip ok?.......a door, a hood, a bonnet....where is the line. I have a tac'd car but am looking at another car that ha; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00150.html (7,576 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:58:24 -0700; Ah, Yes, the argument, "Did you put Alpine parts on a Tiger or did you put Tiger parts on an Alpine." The TAC process is a good thing. I believe well intended, well thought out and well executed. On; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00154.html (9,166 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:14:20 -0500; Part of the issue is that a lot of the (North American) body restoration lingo originated in the body-on-frame days, and when it's applied to unit-construction cars then varying interpretations can c; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00155.html (9,044 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:24:48 -0500; "... but am looking at another car that has a repaired floor and repaired trunk floor........" I told myself I wouldn't say anything because when I got started on my car I remember asking this same q; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00156.html (10,846 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: m_dangelo@verizon.net; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:13 -0500 (CDT); _______________________________________________ Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00157.html (7,399 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:38:21 -0700 (PDT); M- No message was with your post. Thought I would let U know in case U had something important to ask or to tell everyone else. TtT _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.n; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00158.html (7,543 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: m_dangelo@verizon.net; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:44:16 -0500 (CDT); _______________________________________________ Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00159.html (7,163 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: <awtiger@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:17:15 -0400; Andy Walker Edmond, OK B382001600LRXFE TAC #740 B9006857LRX _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00160.html (13,245 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:50:18 +1100; I believe in the TAC program, i think it encourgaes people to restore the cars without rebodying.. there is a lot of ways you can probably dodge it bit not many people know enough about the small de; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00162.html (9,404 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: Tom Hall <modtiger@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:14:49 -0700; For the umpteenth time, No one in the TAC community ever labels anything with it's certification other than Tigers. The failing of a TAC inspection in no way brands the vehicle as an "Alger" or any o; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00163.html (9,433 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: MAURO D'ANGELO <m_dangelo@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:32:11 -0400; It is quite disgusting to think that there are people would actually convert a car of any kind for the purpose of stealing money from the poor buyer who thinks he or she is getting the real deal, wha; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00166.html (11,266 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:42 +1100; Not all the conversinos are from people trying to pass the cars off as real.. when they were cheap cars (70's and 80's) it was a more economical way of repairing them.. swap the parts out, thogh the; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00167.html (9,472 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:50:04 EDT; True enough, at one time it made economic sense to combine a good Alpine unibody with your Tiger parts to make a fun driver. But, these days there's basically zero reason besides fraud to go down tha; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00169.html (10,815 bytes)
14. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:52:03 EDT; That is utter horseshit. When TAC came into existence, Tigers weren't worth enough to justify your assertion. It was about preserving the integrity of the marque. Yeah except I remember all the discu; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00170.html (12,791 bytes)
15. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: MAURO D'ANGELO <m_dangelo@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:04:00 -0400; Yeah, well, actually, altruism means caring about others. What I am talking about it NOT caring about or for others. In fact, I9m talking about slime balls who I think should be put onto a deserted i; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00171.html (13,311 bytes)
16. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: "andrew.heaton" <andrew.heaton@att.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:53:55 -0700; I remember your tiger... was it not the black tiger that was at Smitty's for soooo long. Seems to me that when you open the boot you were looking at the ground. Andy San Diego -- Original Message --; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00177.html (11,002 bytes)
17. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:46:00 -0700; My apology to anyone in the TAC community if my words appeared to misrepresented the group. I did not intend to imply that TAC declared cars as Algers. I was merely trying to differentiate a real Tig; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00180.html (9,801 bytes)
18. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: MAURO D'ANGELO <m_dangelo@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:42:08 -0400; Even though the way you first wrote it did leave open a slight possibility of misunderstanding, I knew exactly what you meant the first time. I truly hate to see a guy feel like he's done something; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00183.html (12,319 bytes)
19. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: arado7@sbcglobal.net; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:11:41 -0700 (PDT); I have read the mail on this topic. I have a different view. My car is an original survivor,I got it in 1985. I use it but I preserve it. I rebuilt the drive train, seats keeping original upholstery; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00184.html (9,616 bytes)
20. Re: [Tigers] tiger originality / authenticity (score: 1): Author: arado7@sbcglobal.net; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:11:43 -0700 (PDT); Tony, I use Hagerty. Agent is John Engle. A sunbeamer. Very good service, fair cost Gary Moore B9472283 Gary- Im insurance shopping- who is youur Tiger insured with. I glad you have such a neat car.; /html/tigers/2010-03/msg00191.html (10,747 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]