Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Re\:\s+Potential\s+new\s+helmet\s+rule\s+would\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Stevens <autox@pursued-with.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:11 -0800
I'm sorry, but I can't believe this for a minute. I absolutely do not believe that an airbag deployment can break the chin protector of a full-face helmet under any imaginable circumstances. I've des
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00070.html (8,772 bytes)

2. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:12:51 -0500
Many years ago I set up a demonstration for my local fire, EMS, and police departments on SRSs and what to look out for when responding to an accident that has a car with SRS. We did a bunch of clas
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00071.html (10,539 bytes)

3. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:13:31 -0500
If you can find the steering wheel SRS device, my hat's off to you. I believe the part is around $900 or more. Matt Murray removing an rather spend another $200 helmet I bought
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00074.html (8,764 bytes)

4. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Coolwalker@aol.com
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:32:27 EST
I took care of the airbag in my 325 a couple months ago by starting deer season a little early and still drove my car home about 150 miles away. Back a few years ago when I didnt know any better, wai
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00076.html (8,893 bytes)

5. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "David W. James" <vnend@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:09:42 -0500
There are a few possible reasons for this, but most of them boil down to neither impact was violent enough to make the airbag needed, just violent enough to trigger it. Did you have bruises on your s
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00078.html (10,093 bytes)

6. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:39:19 -0500
You probably didn't even realize how fast it happen. My friend with an automaker told me of a case about the SRS not deploying. A customer claimed that her bags did not work. The auto maker said othe
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00079.html (10,183 bytes)

7. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "Madurski, Ronald M" <ronald.m.madurski@lmco.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:51:17 -0500
Or maybe the chin strap is making contact with the bottom of the jaw? Ron Madurski
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00080.html (10,475 bytes)

8. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Coolwalker@aol.com
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:59:27 EST
I honestly dont recall having any bruises, if I did they were very minimal. My chest was aching just a little bit from the seatbelt. The adrenaline was going pretty good. I've been autocrossing for o
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00081.html (9,482 bytes)

9. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "Haden, Bruce" <bhaden@ucsd.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:10:01 -0800
--Original Message-- From: owner-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-autox@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Stevens Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 5:53 PM To: Matt Murray Cc: NER; evolution-disc
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00082.html (11,217 bytes)

10. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "Steven T. Ekstrand" <cyberlaw@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:09:59 -0800
I disagree about the lawyer comment. Nothing at all clear cut about this. Benefits to full face, but possibly a concern here with the air bags, no definitive answers. There is a strong presumption t
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00083.html (10,865 bytes)

11. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <ebsalem1@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:38:36 -0600
Whatever we think may be immaterial. The SCCA probably knew this would upset some apple-carts. The Area Directors certainly did. Insurers of motorsport sanctions all over the world are have harder ti
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00085.html (9,852 bytes)

12. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:45:05 -0500
Got it. But, you still need to spend $2.99 for the roll of black tape to put of the fault light for the SRS. :^) Matt Murray
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00086.html (10,345 bytes)

13. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:47:08 -0500
Yes, I know. But, does M-T use the same QC metrics for O-rings as they do SRS propellant? <j/k> :^) Matt Murray
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00087.html (10,209 bytes)

14. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Salem" <ebsalem1@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:04:36 -0600
Yes, I know. But, does M-T use the same QC metrics for O-rings as they do SRS propellant? <j/k> :^) Bad taste alert: Hey, it wasn't the O-rings...It was the teacher that said, "What's this button do
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00088.html (9,627 bytes)

15. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:55:21 -0500
What about side air bags? And rear seat air bags? And how about seats that have air bags integrated into them? Sooooo many questions. Me? I'll take every last chance to survive a bad head-on crash th
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00092.html (10,040 bytes)

16. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:51:01 -0500
But we could always try to get you to re-up your membership. :^) So Phil, what are you doing next September? :^) Matt Murray standing to write can't kick me
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00102.html (9,922 bytes)

17. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:52:30 -0500
So YOU were the guy that bought the ticket to the movie!! Matt Murray Demolition Man
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00103.html (9,540 bytes)

18. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:16:15 -0500
Maybe they got 'em confused like the folks who built the Hubble Matt Murray
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00106.html (9,574 bytes)

19. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:10:58 -0600
Presumably recovering from the Vintage Sports Car Rendezvous in Grand Rapids Minnesota in June, the Vintage Triumph Register convention in Rockford Illinois in July, and the Lotus Owners Gathering in
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00108.html (10,852 bytes)

20. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Fulton" <Robert_Fulton@email.msn.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:19:21 -0800
I'm not a safety engineer, but I'd much rather have a fiberglass/carbon fiber bar in front of my face than nothing if confronted with a 200MPH gasbag being thrust at it! Ther is nothing in the refere
/html/autox/2004-11/msg00110.html (9,288 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu