Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+SS\s+getting\s+DSQ\'ed\s+\/video\s+tapes\s+allowed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+SS\s+getting\s+DSQ\'ed\s+\/video\s+tapes\s+allowed\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [evolution-disc.] SS getting DSQ'ed /video tapes allowed (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:46:22 -0400 (EDT); This is the part I never really understood. I can see impound needing to check stickers and such, but finishing position doesn't matter for that. Once the "regular" impound checks are done (particul; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00181.html (8,239 bytes)
2. Re: [evolution-disc.] SS getting DSQ'ed /video tapes allowed (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:49:53 -0500; For exactly the reason the BS Class used the video tape for. The results were wrong. If you don't get to see the official results, how can you protest a mistake? Why are people so intent on getting o; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00185.html (8,951 bytes)
3. Re: [evolution-disc.] SS getting DSQ'ed /video tapes allowed (score: 1): Author: "eric salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:10:30 -0500; This legalistic discussion is all well and fine, but you're missing the point of the story. The entire class agreed they nobody was protesting, and acknowleged their willingness to waive that right w; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00190.html (8,389 bytes)
4. Re: [evolution-disc.] SS getting DSQ'ed /video tapes allowed (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@winchell.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:42:58 -0700 (PDT); I agree. Similar to the distinction between justice and law. Common sense should have solved this problem. worker. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http:; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00192.html (8,511 bytes)
5. Re: [evolution-disc.] SS getting DSQ'ed /video tapes allowed (score: 1): Author: Tom Maycock <tmaycock@interaccess.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:44:23 -0500 (CDT); I think the point is, or should be: 1) You stay in impound until released. Period. If for no other reason than to show basic respect to the specialty chiefs and all of your other fellow competitors.; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00193.html (8,752 bytes)
6. Re: [evolution-disc.] SS getting DSQ'ed /video tapes allowed (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:03:54 -0500; First, I dis-agree with the sentiment that the event officials are not needed and that the competitors can simply decide when to leave. The competitors are not the only ones who need to see the cars.; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00195.html (10,191 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]