Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[mgs\]\s+Springs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[mgs\]\s+Springs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [mgs] Springs (score: 1): Author: walter menge <walter.menge@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 99 01:06:11 Central Daylight Time; The ride heigth of the B is not the same for all years. I believe it was about the time of the introduction of the rubber bumpers the heigth was raised some. I am can give the year and the amount rai; /html/mgs/1999-07/msg00827.html (6,647 bytes)
2. [mgs] Springs (score: 1): Author: Florrie & Allen Bachelder <bachldrs@swva.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:27:40 -0400; It went up 1-1/2" with the debut of the rubber-bumper models: '74-1/2 through '80. It went up agaiin - about 2 feet - when I replaced the rear springs on my '76 ((aarrgh...)). Allen ** Allen H. Bache; /html/mgs/1999-07/msg00845.html (7,207 bytes)
3. Re: [mgs] Springs (score: 1): Author: James Nazarian Jr <James.Nazarian@Colorado.EDU>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:26:10 -0600 (MDT); When the car went to rubber bumpers in 75 the ride height was raised an inch because the govt was threatening regulating bumper height. The 74.5 cars with full rubber overriders were not raised, but; /html/mgs/1999-07/msg00853.html (7,099 bytes)
4. Re: [Mgs] Springs (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:12:54 -0700; The MGB GT V8 sat almost an inch higher than the regular four cylinder car. At the front the cross member had the raised pads seen on rubber bumper 4 cylinders to allow clearance for the early V8 oi; /html/mgs/2007-08/msg00163.html (8,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]