Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+1950\'s\s+GMC\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+1950\'s\s+GMC\'s\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [oletrucks] 1950's GMC's (score: 1): Author: Thomas Allen <thallen@nwlink.com>; Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 10:40:02 -0800; I've had a 48 half ton and now have a 51 one ton. If you plan to stick with stock suspension I'd get a model with tube-type shocks. They are much cheaper when you have to replace them. The knee-actio; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00007.html (8,217 bytes)
2. [oletrucks] 1950's GMC's (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 23:03:12 -0700; Do I like early 50's, or later 50's GMC's ? YES! Originally, I was thinking early 50's, but have seen several later models that were "quite nice". I even saw a (I think) 1957 550 LCF that a gent in M; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00030.html (7,832 bytes)
3. [oletrucks] 1950's GMC's (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:18:43 -0700; Is there any year of GMC that I should steer clear of? I imagine some years are better than others, but a lot of the choice will be made for me because of limited availability. Also, I suspect I'll h; /html/oletrucks/2001-11/msg00390.html (6,679 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]