Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+305\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+305\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: mark <ccpanel@jps.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:42:10 -0800; i run a 305 in my panel. somtimes wish i ran a bigger motor. 305 is same stroke as 350. smaller bore. 307 is same bore as 350 but shorter stroke. so-307 will give you power over 3000 rpm and 305 will; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00293.html (7,545 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "laurieandmike" <lauriecorbett@ns.sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:48:13 -0400; hi again i got a 305 HO engiine in my 84 z28 i needed parts for it and went to gm and they told me the 305 ho is a 307 so thats the parts i had to replace it with i am not a engine expert or anything; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00296.html (8,733 bytes)
3. RE: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "AKBurke" <akburke@cableone.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:19:03 -0700; Thanks to all for the recent smallblock discussion...I found it interesting, and very informative. ...leaves me with some questions though... What's a '383-stroker' ?? where does this fit in the SBC; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00311.html (8,317 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: <kpierce@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 21:55:21 -0600; I think a 383 is typically a 350 block with a 3.75" (400 small block) crankshaft stroke which yields 383 cubic inches. Good for torque, but not exceptionally high rpm. interesting, and/or under intak; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00314.html (9,242 bytes)
5. RE: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "Blaine & Maggie Dumkee" <bmdumkee@auroranet.nt.ca>; Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 21:05:36 -0700; A 383 stroker is generally a 350 small block with a different crank and rods, making a longer stroke, hence the stroker part. The new crank and connecting rods give the engine a longer stroke and the; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00316.html (9,086 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:43:55 -0700; Also, I understand the bottom edges of the cylinders have to be machined so the rods don't hit them. I've also been told that the angle of the rods can be a problem. But GM has a crate 383 hi-torque; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00319.html (10,387 bytes)
7. [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: Pastorjon994@cs.com; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:21:27 EDT; Do any of you have any experience with a 305 engine. I was wondering about a fit, availability of parts, etc., for my truck. The salvage yard has one for $400. I'm not real sure which list this goes; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00314.html (7,323 bytes)
8. RE: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "Mike " <passnb4u@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:57:30 -0700; I assume you're talking about a V8 305? If so, parts are plentiful. If you're talking about the big V6 that GMC had, not sure about parts. about a for -- Mike -- passnb4u@earthlink.net oletrucks is; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00318.html (7,970 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: jls <jls@seavcom.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:08:35 -0700 (PDT); Are we talking a 305 chevy or GMC? The 305 chevy is a small block same outside dimensions as all the smallblock chevies. The 305 GMC is an over designed V6. There aren't any performance parts availab; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00319.html (7,906 bytes)
10. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "Durwood B. Darbin" <dhckdkcsk@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:35:33; Is a GMC 305 a V6 or a straight six? If a straight six, will it fit in a 49 GMC 3/4 ton kinda like a 235/261 will go in a Chevy where a 216 was? The GMC path is really fuzzy for me. What inline six e; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00320.html (7,561 bytes)
11. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: jls <jls@seavcom.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:56:54 -0700 (PDT); The GMC 305 is a V6. What you want is the GMC 270/292 I6 It's a little longer but I've heard about people putting them in where a 235 once was. Thanks, -JLS I'm climbing for the American Lung Associa; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00321.html (8,096 bytes)
12. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: THE BROWNS <armory@swbell.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:12:24 -0500; I have/ had (sitting at the moment waiting until I get rid if it) a 305 in a 85 monte carlo. The head gasket blew. In the monte its a 10hr shop time, so too much $ for a clunker. Anyways, from everyo; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00322.html (7,525 bytes)
13. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "dpewter" <dpewter@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:36:38 -0500; You may be thinking of the GMC 302, which was the largest IL6 & there are performance parts for those, but rebuilding (even stock) is a lot more expensive than it's smaller brothers. Yes, I believe a; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00324.html (9,120 bytes)
14. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: john dorsey <jrdorsey@strato.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:21:37 -0400; I believe the 305 was a later v-6. There is a copy of a 1949 GMC advertisement showing the different engines toward the bottom of this web page: http://www.strato.net/~jrdorsey/gmc/ I think GMC may; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00327.html (8,441 bytes)
15. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "Bobby D Keeland" <bob_keeland@usgs.gov>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:09:34 -0500; Has anyone on the list actually installed a GMC 270/292 into an advanced design truck? Or, does anyone know of a magazine article that shows the installation. I wonder what modifications would be nec; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00333.html (10,153 bytes)
16. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: Eman <ej-pj-dj@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:34:39 -0700; My 48 suburban has the 56' 270gmc w/302 head with a five port Mcgurk intake w/triple 1bl strombergs and dual exhaust. The radiator is mounted to the front side of the support. The cross member was no; /html/oletrucks/2001-09/msg00339.html (10,519 bytes)
17. [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Duncan" <rondunc@webzone.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:19:38 -0600; I have a 1951Chevy 1/2 ton already set up for a 350 that I am restoring. A client owes me $1100.00. He owns a transmission shop. He is installing a beefed up 350 in a 99 Z-28 for one of his customers; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00430.html (7,303 bytes)
18. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: Passnb4U@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 19:20:21 EST; to I'd wonder where he got the motor and tranny from, the 700 wasn't put in the new F-Bodies, and I don't think the 305 are either, sure it's not from a '89 IROC Z 28? Mike oletrucks is devoted to Ch; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00439.html (7,738 bytes)
19. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: MarkNoakes@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 22:45:30 EST; Agreed that 89 sounds more correct than 99 which makes one wonder about the shape of the engine. . .is it really almost new and does it really have only 10K miles on it?. . . As to the 305. . .A whil; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00448.html (7,429 bytes)
20. Re: [oletrucks] 305 (score: 1): Author: "Bartman" <rsmith@nckcn.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:25:36 -0600; not sure if this helps answer Passnb4u's question or not or not but I have an 84 Camaro with a 305 and a 700 R4 tranny.its stock. Bartman 1951 3100 OutStandingInMyField Some Where On The High Plaines; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00465.html (9,156 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]