Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+305\s+vs\s+350\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+305\s+vs\s+350\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] 305 vs 350 (score: 1): Author: J Forbes <jforbes@primenet.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:32:15 -0700; I'd put a big block in it, but normal folks would probably do ok with either a 305 or 350. You might get a bit better mileage with a 305, or maybe not. You will have less torque and power with the sm; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00605.html (7,908 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] 305 vs 350 (score: 1): Author: MarkNoakes@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 22:39:35 EST; My 86 Silverado came with a 305 and 3 speed auto with lockup torque converter running thru a 2.73 final diff. That was back in the days of 55mph speed limits and it got 22 mpg when new and running wi; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00614.html (7,620 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] 305 vs 350 (score: 1): Author: TORODRVR@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 17:08:22 EST; << Ever since new it has had trouble with pinging; the dealer said that the 305's were all like that. I've since heard that there is an issue with valve shrouding on the 305 heads as opposed to the 3; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00635.html (7,027 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]