Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+350\-305\s+sb\s+chevy\s+crank\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+350\-305\s+sb\s+chevy\s+crank\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] 350-305 sb chevy crank (score: 1): Author: "Gary R. Schwarzrock" <gschwarz@airtimeisp.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 15:10:02 -0600; Can any of you wrench turners tell me if a 305 chevy crank can be safely used "as is" in a 350 engine? All the chevy reference material shows the same casting numbers for both, but I've been told tha; /html/oletrucks/2004-04/msg00182.html (7,323 bytes)
2. RE: [oletrucks] 350-305 sb chevy crank (score: 1): Author: "Mike Baggese" <passnb4u@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:48:04 -0700; Not as is. The 305 crank has different balancing features than the 350, even though it's the same casting numbers...I believe it's lightened more...I don't recall though. But, as with any rotating a; /html/oletrucks/2004-04/msg00187.html (7,238 bytes)
3. RE: [oletrucks] 350-305 sb chevy crank (score: 1): Author: "S Schmidt" <sheldon@ssmachine.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:09:48 -0700; Don't know about the 305 crank...but I put a 307 crank in a 350 4 bolt block, did have it all balanced before assy. put 105K miles on it before it sucked a valve :( It made a good runnin 327, dropped; /html/oletrucks/2004-04/msg00188.html (7,202 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] 350-305 sb chevy crank (score: 1): Author: J Forbes <jforb@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:29:54 -0700; The 305 and 350 crank castings are the same, but they are machined differently, one of them (I believe the 350) has holes drilled longways throught the journals to lighten them, because the pistons; /html/oletrucks/2004-04/msg00189.html (8,095 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]