Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+52\-62\s+Vette\s+front\s+end\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+52\-62\s+Vette\s+front\s+end\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [oletrucks] 52-62 Vette front end (score: 1): Author: "Jay Baker" <jaybaker@ruralnetwork.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 07:38:33 -0600; Anybody out there ever use a 52-62 vette front end there a similiar install to Mustang 11 ie they bolt to the frame and there Chevy you can also use your stock hubs if ya wana use stock wheels or mak; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00148.html (8,607 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] 52-62 Vette front end (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 07:51:41 -0700; I thought the first vette's were built on Chevy car suspension. Is the early vette different than the cars in any way that would matter? Anybody out there ever use a 52-62 vette front end there a sim; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00149.html (9,025 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] 52-62 Vette front end (score: 1): Author: mark@noakes.com; Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 09:22:43 -0700 (PDT); The C1 Corvette model ran from 53 thru 62. The very first of the series, 53-55, did use alot of the standard Chevy parts, but by the 56 model I believe they were starting to diverge. I believe that t; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00153.html (10,136 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] 52-62 Vette front end (score: 1): Author: "G. L. Perry" <glperry@fwi.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:32:45 -0500; Vette came out in 53 or 54. It had same front bolt on suspension as the standard Auto of that year and used that same set-up to 62. 63 was a new product. I have gotten parts for a 54 I had that were; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00155.html (10,159 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]