Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Carb\s+question\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Carb\s+question\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: "Antonio R. Tijerino" <antonio@innercite.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 22:49:15 -0700; I hope this is not a FAQ, but for the AD trucks with the 235 engine, which carb is better? The rochester or the Carter? What are the differences and the CFM specs of each? Which one would go better w; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00122.html (7,559 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: "jack halton" <safesix@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 06:45:27 -0400; I do't know much about the Carter carbs but there were many different Rochester model B single barrel carbs offered on GM inlines. They vary in CFM from about 200 to 250. CFM ratings for inline engin; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00123.html (9,345 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: ldfinley@juno.com; Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 10:28:25 -0500; Thanks for the tip, Jack. With my '51 AD with a 216, and B model Rochester carb, only getting about 10 mpg, I had been seriously considering getting a Toyota truck. My '51 is a daily driver, so any g; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00129.html (10,369 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: David G Shier <dshier@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 20:18:14 -0600; Jack, I am working on an installation of 2x1 barrels on a Fenton dual intake and do not care about milage but want it to work well for around a small town and short trips. (nostalgia situation) We ha; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00135.html (11,244 bytes)
5. RE: [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: "Ralph Linnell" <ChevySix@seatac.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 20:35:39 -0700; Tell us about the "Special Six: you are building. Ralph Linnell Inliners International Membership Chairman Chevysix@seatac.net http://www.seatac.net/chevysix/ --Original Message-- From: owner-oletruc; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00136.html (8,052 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: soundex@eden.com (craig k); Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 11:48:13 -0600; Try a smaller main jet - our truck is the same setup; gets 12 mpg. Main metering orifice (jet) is a 54; have been told that a 48 would be MUCH better for efficiency and drivability, but have been un; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00141.html (7,917 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>; Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 14:58:06 -0400; The 216 carbs I've seen have either 51's or 52's in them. I've heard of people brazing them and then redrilling. I read not to mix original and drilled jet's with multi carb setups as they don't flow; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00142.html (8,597 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: Passnb4U@aol.com; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 01:41:46 EDT; << Try a smaller main jet - our truck is the same setup; gets 12 mpg. Main metering orifice (jet) is a 54; have been told that a 48 would be MUCH better for efficiency and drivability, but have been; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00146.html (8,167 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] Carb question. (score: 1): Author: "jack halton" <safesix@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 20:47:34 -0400; The Monojet Rochester was available on GM 194/230/250/292 inlines from 1968 to 1972. It was relatively short-lived because of the fuel crisis and emissions concerns. It uses a metering rod like AFBs; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00157.html (12,929 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]