Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Door\s+Rubber\s+Comparison\:\s+Chevy\s+Duty\s+vs\s+Steele\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Door\s+Rubber\s+Comparison\:\s+Chevy\s+Duty\s+vs\s+Steele\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [oletrucks] Door Rubber Comparison: Chevy Duty vs Steele (score: 1): Author: "K. M. Lehmann" <klehmann@bentonrea.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:58:02 -0700; Hi Al & All I think you will like the stuff from ChevyDuty, now that we have warmer weather the doors on my '54 close good, and I never set the door latches out it. You asked about adhesive removal,; /html/oletrucks/2004-06/msg00074.html (9,360 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Door Rubber Comparison: Chevy Duty vs Steele (score: 1): Author: Mask1966@aol.com; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:41:40 EDT; In a message dated 6/8/2004 2:48:10 PM Central Standard Time, alan@alanhorvath.com writes: Chevy Duty wins, hands down! They are virtually the SAME ... except in price! I got 2 lengths of door rubber; /html/oletrucks/2004-06/msg00075.html (8,152 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Door Rubber Comparison: Chevy Duty vs Steele (score: 1): Author: Alan Horvath <alan@alanhorvath.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:23:51 -0400; Thanks, Lee I bought some stuff called Goo Gone, recommended by someone who used it before. It CAN mess with paint, so I've been thinking about the need to mask things off - I ain't takin' no chances; /html/oletrucks/2004-06/msg00076.html (8,332 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Door Rubber Comparison: Chevy Duty vs Steele (score: 1): Author: "thomasind" <thomasind@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:32:13 -0700; All you door rubber guys: I'm in the process of fitting doors on my unpainted 55 first 1/2 T - would like a better door outer face fit / opening edge margin than factory with weld / grind if needed.; /html/oletrucks/2004-06/msg00077.html (9,510 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Door Rubber Comparison: Chevy Duty vs Steele (score: 1): Author: Alan Horvath <alan@alanhorvath.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 00:43:37 -0400; HA! I got a real laugh out of that one, Dave. Thanks. Alan http://AlanHorvath.com/54chevy/ oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2004-06/msg00078.html (7,931 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Door Rubber Comparison: Chevy Duty vs Steele (score: 1): Author: "K. M. Lehmann" <klehmann@bentonrea.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 23:37:52 -0700; It seems like 3/8 *- 1/8 works fine. On my '54 I took out about 1/8" by cutting thru the step with a cutting disk and rewelding drawing the lower aft body skin in to match the door and the seal still; /html/oletrucks/2004-06/msg00079.html (10,344 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Door Rubber Comparison: Chevy Duty vs Steele (score: 1): Author: Alan Horvath <alan@alanhorvath.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:37:44 -0400; I didn't have any problems -- I haven't used it yet ... I was just referring to the info on the glue remover that says it MAY be damaging to paint; so I'm gonna be extra careful with it. My paint is; /html/oletrucks/2004-06/msg00080.html (8,270 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] Door Rubber Comparison: Chevy Duty vs Steele (score: 1): Author: "thomasind" <thomasind@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:57:34 -0700; Thanks Lee - just what I was looking for. I also planned on splitting the jam step moving in or out. Looked like jam originally with 1/2 step - wanted to adjust doors for best fit making sure they st; /html/oletrucks/2004-06/msg00081.html (9,905 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]