Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Drive\s+Line\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Drive\s+Line\s+Question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [oletrucks] Drive Line Question (score: 1): Author: "Green, Steven D" <sgreen@ku.edu>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:03:10 -0500; I would like to update my 1953 Chev to an open driveline. I have been offered a 1957 Chev at a cheap price. Both are 235-4 speed trans. Will the transmission,rear end, and driveshaft from the 1957 Ch; /html/oletrucks/2007-08/msg00038.html (7,031 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Drive Line Question (score: 1): Author: "Craig Kruse" <cmkruse@hughes.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:36:08 -0400; Steve, I don't know about the swap but if you are parting with your original torque tube rear with bendix brakes I would sure like to have it for my 49 panel so I can upgrade from the huck brakes. Le; /html/oletrucks/2007-08/msg00039.html (7,701 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Drive Line Question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <Steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:19:00 -0700; The water pump is a little longer, and you'll want to use the '53 bellhousing. You'll need to drill new holes in the axle pads to locate the rear correctly. I haven't done this swap, but those are th; /html/oletrucks/2007-08/msg00041.html (7,770 bytes)
4. RE: [oletrucks] Drive Line Question (score: 1): Author: "Robert Baird" <bairdr54@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:08:52 -0500 (Central Daylight Time); I am not sure on the frame of the 53 being the same as 54 but the same swamp did work on my 54 Robert Baird --Original Message-- I would like to update my 1953 Chev to an open driveline. I have been; /html/oletrucks/2007-08/msg00044.html (7,622 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Drive Line Question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <Steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:58:19 -0700; There are a couple differences between a '54 and '53 frame. The most important in this context is that the bellhousing crossmember is different, and easiest solution is to use the '53 bellhousing. If; /html/oletrucks/2007-08/msg00045.html (7,473 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Drive Line Question (score: 1): Author: "Robert Baird" <bairdr54@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:34:19 -0500 (Central Daylight Time); But the point is the SM 420 Trans will fit ether Bell housing the only difference in the frame that will come into play is where to attach the spring shackles hangers brackets For the rear axle if th; /html/oletrucks/2007-08/msg00047.html (8,340 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]