Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Engine\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Engine\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Engine (score: 1): Author: DRayC007@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 22:31:51 EDT; I have a 1953 chevy 1/2 ton pickup truck but the engine has been changed, how can I identify the size and year of the engine? Thanks, Dale oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 19; /html/oletrucks/2004-07/msg00006.html (6,418 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Engine (score: 1): Author: The Botelers <boteler@olg.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 01:09:51 -0400; Give us the casting numbers off of the side of the block. There should also be a stamped serial number on a smooth machined surface...what's that number? Is it a 6 or 8 cylinder? Need more info! Mike; /html/oletrucks/2004-07/msg00007.html (7,068 bytes)
3. [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "Robert Kremer" <hrkremer@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:07:48 -0700; Those of you who have placed 350 motors in your AD trucks, have you used the stock unit with 210 horse power or the newer HO unit with 330 horse power? I need to order my motor this week for my 50 31; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00358.html (7,337 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: joegarcia1@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 14:09:51 +0000; Hi Robert - If you don't plan to tow anything or do much racing then the 210 Hp motor will be just fine. That 210 Hp was what my old 67 RS Camaro was rated at with a 2 barrel carburetor. Slapping on; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00359.html (7,905 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 07:13:51 -0700; How are you planning to drive it? If you won't use that extra 120 horses, why would you pay for them? Says the guy with a 454... Those of you who have placed 350 motors in your AD trucks, have you us; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00360.html (7,747 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "K Ohlgren" <kjohlgren@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:47:46 +0000; I thought the reason for putting the V8 in a '50 truck was HP. Why go all this way to put in an undersized V8? Think of the answer you will give every time some one asks, how big? For reliability I; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00362.html (9,324 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:00:21 -0700; I'd rethink the fuel injection bit. More efficient, more responsive, starts easier,etc. I'd check around. Maybe someone on the list could help you with information, experiences. I suspect the cheapes; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00363.html (8,944 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: ke6bnl@juno.com; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:43:59 -0700; Doesn't the 330 ho motor also include the carb, intake, distrubutor, flexplate and damper pulley and maybe the water pump?? not sure if the other one does. Ed ke6bnl +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00366.html (8,294 bytes)
9. [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "laurie" <lauriecorbett@ns.sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:09:30 -0400; i just ran my 55 chevy for the first time sine i started rebuilding took awile to get running but with the fresh 350 rebuild it went pretty good with 65lbs oil pressure and no leakes soo far ...i als; /html/oletrucks/2002-01/msg00023.html (6,758 bytes)
10. [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "laurie" <lauriecorbett@ns.sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 18:50:14 -0400; i just rebuilt my 350 chev and was tring to start it today to break it in and all i could get was banging and it would not start whats the problem? thanks mike oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM tr; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00348.html (7,178 bytes)
11. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "A.B." <bigfred@unm.edu>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 16:10:09 -0700 (MST); Is the distributor 180 deg out of phase? oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00351.html (7,387 bytes)
12. [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "laurie" <lauriecorbett@ns.sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 22:34:31 -0400; no its a firing bang like out of timing but i dont know what to do ... how can i tell what cylinder is tdc i need #1tdc right ...? it rolls good i pre lubed it it got 70psi oil pressure...what now? i; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00355.html (7,341 bytes)
13. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "steven stuckmeyer" <slstu@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 21:49:35 -0600; To put the engine at TDC, put the crank shaft timing mark at TDC on the scale. At TDC the #1 piston should be all the way up in the bore at the same time the timing mark on the crank shaft at TDC. At; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00357.html (8,020 bytes)
14. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: Bruce K <bekett@uslink.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 22:34:57 -0600; Just one thing more. Make sure that both valves are closed or you could be one rotation off. This would put the distributor 1/2 turn off. You can either pull the valve covers or check for air coming; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00358.html (8,944 bytes)
15. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "steven stuckmeyer" <slstu@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 05:56:09 -0600; I knew I was forgetting something. 51 3100 St Peters, MO -- Original Message -- From: Bruce K Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:42 PM To: oletrucks@autox.team.net Subject: Re: [oletrucks] engine; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00360.html (9,293 bytes)
16. [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "laurie" <lauriecorbett@ns.sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 15:00:30 -0400; ITS ALIVE!!!!!!! i finally got it working.....thank god....and i owe it all to you great guys on here....turns out it was the oil pump shaft not lining up right with the distributor and making it go; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00391.html (7,667 bytes)
17. RE: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: Jim Bullmaster <jbullmas@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:36:07 -0800; Congratulations, I have a feeling this is just the beginning.... ITS ALIVE!!!!!!! i finally got it working.....thank god....and i owe it all to you great guys on here....turns out it was the oil pump; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00393.html (8,076 bytes)
18. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "steven stuckmeyer" <slstu@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:52:28 -0600; "and i can enjoy xmas now not worring about what i did wrong" We never do anything "wrong," it's just not quite right yet!! Everyone have a Blessed Holiday, Merry Christmas Steve 51 3100 St Peters, M; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00394.html (8,103 bytes)
19. [oletrucks] Engine (score: 1): Author: "Ed Gaito" <ed_gaito@webtrix.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:34:54 -0500; I finally found a casting number that made sense, and the engine in my '50 GMC is indeed a 228, so the next question is whether or not to stick with it or start planning a swap. I would prefer not to; /html/oletrucks/2001-03/msg00334.html (7,368 bytes)
20. Re: [oletrucks] Engine (score: 1): Author: David G Shier <dshier@rmi.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:10:31 -0700; I just found out today that my 228 has a cracked head. As soon as it gets back home we will check casting numbers and may be looking for a head to replace this one. It ran really strong but some cool; /html/oletrucks/2001-03/msg00336.html (8,025 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]