Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Ford\s+9\"\s+Rear\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Ford\s+9\"\s+Rear\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Ford 9" Rear (score: 1): Author: Jim Wilkerson <Jim.Wilkerson@sas.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:56:02 -0400; I am considering using a Ford 9" rear end in my 53 Chevy 3100 pickup. I plan to use a 350 Chevy crate engine and 700R4 trans. 1) Are there any 'gotcha's' to using a Ford 9"? Pro's / Con's 2) Does an; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00346.html (7,670 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Ford 9" Rear (score: 1): Author: "A.B." <bigfred@unm.edu>; Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:34:03 -0600 (MDT); Mid 6ts ford trucks (1/2) ton seem to have a perfect fit(61") hub to hub. Iv'e got 2 sitting in my yard. I guess the better case to look for is one with "WAR" stamped on the housing. They look pretty; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00347.html (8,161 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Ford 9" Rear (score: 1): Author: Darren_Lewis@amat.com; Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:55:42 -0500; I am working on a 1941 chevy truck 1/2 ton, and I am wanting to know the same thing. I am putting in a 327 and TH400 tranny. Any on know on where to place each unit in the frame. Where to mark the Fr; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00349.html (8,374 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Ford 9" Rear (score: 1): Author: "Brian _" <pkupman57@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:47:20 -0700; make sure you get a 2WD truck rear end. i made that mistake and bought a houseing from a truck that had 4WD, the 4WD ones have the center section mounted too far off center to work without a T-case.; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00351.html (8,036 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Ford 9" Rear (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Morisette" <kmm1024@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:29:27 -0700; I got a 9" out of a '65 thunderbird, I forget the exact measurements, but they were very close to stock, around 61" (I think stock is 62"). I wanted to be able to use the widest tires possible withou; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00357.html (10,333 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Ford 9" Rear (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Morisette" <kmm1024@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:32:06 -0700; Those have the 5 on 5 bolt pattern, right? If you're using Ford rotors up front too off a car (like Gernada), I think you'll have to get it out of a car to get 5 on 4.5?. ____________________________; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00358.html (9,791 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Ford 9" Rear (score: 1): Author: "A.B." <bigfred@unm.edu>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:13:33 -0600 (MDT); hm.... hadn't gotten that far. I was going to use a pacer up front. I don't even know what bolt pattern that is :) Cross that one when I come to it... oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks buil; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00394.html (10,352 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]