Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Ford\s+9\"\s+rearend\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Ford\s+9\"\s+rearend\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Ford 9" rearend (score: 1): Author: "Stephanie" <stephanie@annexe.cwnet.com>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 13:55:18 -0700; I guess I'm looking for a Ford 9" rearend with the smaller bolt spacing (4" something, not 5"), with the right width (about 60")...and these only came in rare mustangs, cougars, etc. with big blocks; /html/oletrucks/2001-05/msg00153.html (8,064 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Ford 9" rearend (score: 1): Author: "Al&Judy" <cayfords@sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 17:58:01 -0400; The 9" rear that my Nova buddies use is the one from first generation Broncos, from what I have been told, width is near perfect. Al 49/54 Rod project -- Original Message -- From: "Stephanie" <stepha; /html/oletrucks/2001-05/msg00154.html (8,986 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Ford 9" rearend (score: 1): Author: "Brian _" <pkupman57@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 16:42:49 -0700; i bought a housing from a mid 70's F-100 or F-150 for $30, it already had the perches ground off and no brakes or axles or carrier. it is, i believe 54" flange to flange. its about 2.5" narrower than; /html/oletrucks/2001-05/msg00156.html (7,489 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]