Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Fuel\s+Injected\s+V\-6\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Fuel\s+Injected\s+V\-6\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [oletrucks] Fuel Injected V-6 (score: 1): Author: Thomas Allen <thallen@nwlink.com>; Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 10:53:14 -0800; Cams, exhaust and intake manifolding can greatly improve fuel economy and power at the same time. It's not necessarily a trade off. Head design and associated manifolding were originally done to be c; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00008.html (10,616 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Fuel Injected V-6 (score: 1): Author: Kirk <kpierce@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 20:42:14 -0500; Is your 3 speed od a manual or automatic? Also, I'm thinking the TBI would be much easier to make look "retro" because it could sit on one of the 283 style (oil filler in the manifold) intakes. That; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00012.html (11,972 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Fuel Injected V-6 (score: 1): Author: Kirk <kpierce@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 23:49:01 -0500; Mark, We have a very similar setup. My '57 has a 283, 3 speed manual, 3.90 gears, and I scoured local junkyards to get two overdrive units. Had a tranny shop put the best parts together to get a 3 sp; /html/oletrucks/2001-12/msg00028.html (14,848 bytes)
4. [oletrucks] Fuel Injected V-6 (score: 1): Author: ldfinley@juno.com; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:32:29 -0600; Hi All, Has anybody out there experimented by pulling out their old 216 or 225 and putting in a small to midsize V-6 with fuel injection attached to an automatic overdrive tranny. I'd like to upgrade; /html/oletrucks/2001-11/msg00391.html (7,504 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Fuel Injected V-6 (score: 1): Author: "Peters, Jon C" <jpeters@sikorsky.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:07:22 -0500; Its OK to go that route. I was first looking at a Mercedes i6 fi diesel to go in my truck. Whatever floats your boat. Try the 4.3 Chevy v6. It comes with fi and basically it's a 350 cut down by 2 cy; /html/oletrucks/2001-11/msg00392.html (9,106 bytes)
6. RE: [oletrucks] Fuel Injected V-6 (score: 1): Author: "Mike " <passnb4u@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:24:39 -0800; Well, personally I don't think you'll see that kind of milage with a V6 in one of these trucks. Take a look at the MPG figures for the new full size V6 (injected, etc) and expect a bit less than they; /html/oletrucks/2001-11/msg00393.html (8,592 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Fuel Injected V-6 (score: 1): Author: "Allen Jones" <jonesal@u.washington.edu>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:36:32 -0800; Why on earth would I want to pull my inline in favor of a V engine? The 261 in the '50 has more power than I need and gets ~20 mpg with dual carbs. Allen in Seattle '50 3100 http://students.washingto; /html/oletrucks/2001-11/msg00395.html (9,517 bytes)
8. RE: [oletrucks] Fuel Injected V-6 (score: 1): Author: mark@noakes.com; Date: 30 Nov 2001 15:33:40 -0800; I've mentioned before on the list that my 350 TPI V8 Corvette gets 28 mpg at 75 mph on the highway. It has 2.73 gears behind a 700R4 and so it turns about 1800 rpm at the same 75 mph. It weighs about; /html/oletrucks/2001-11/msg00398.html (10,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]