Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Late\s+model\s+Chevy\s+IFS\s+bolt\s+in\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Late model Chevy IFS bolt in (score: 1)
Author: Byron Schluter <b_schluter@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
To the group, I just read Roger Gleason's reply about using the 74-87 1/2 ton front crossmember and suspension in AD trucks. I've been interested in this possibilty for about two years now. One quest
/html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00227.html (7,942 bytes)

2. Re: [oletrucks] Late model Chevy IFS bolt in (score: 1)
Author: Roger.Gleason@uconn.edu
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:02:34 -0400
Its not my web site and I haven't made the change yet as I'm waiting for the right one to come along. I have found too many bent A frames, as they tend to be from work trucks that have hit rocks whil
/html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00259.html (10,220 bytes)

3. Re: [oletrucks] Late model Chevy IFS bolt in (score: 1)
Author: "Claude" <cramey@dashlink.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 19:42:55 -0500
inches. I think a better comparison would be to measure at the hub where the lug nuts are. That would make my width real close to 62 inches. My resto pack says "front tread ?" for a 3104 is 60.75 in
/html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00275.html (9,043 bytes)

4. RE: [oletrucks] Late model Chevy IFS bolt in (score: 1)
Author: "Armijo, Manuel L" <manuel.l.armijo@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:58:37 -0700
Yes, the track is wider. I also found (from a member's post) that the reason one of my wheels sticks out more than the other is that certain rotors are thicker...I still need to go pull the rotors (a
/html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00335.html (9,819 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu