Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Question\s+about\s+283\s+vs\.\s+350\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Question\s+about\s+283\s+vs\.\s+350\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Question about 283 vs. 350 (score: 1): Author: CyrusR@aol.com; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 21:46:18 EDT; I've got a pair of engines that I'm considering building for my '57 half ton. I'm very experienced with engines, but not sure which way to go in this case. I'm having a little trouble deciding which; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00470.html (8,056 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Question about 283 vs. 350 (score: 1): Author: Snwbord24@aol.com; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 21:59:22 EDT; I am currently running a 350 w/ HEI out of a '79 Camaro. This engine and the radiator it had in it came with the truck. I'm pretty sure the radiator was not stock but I had cooling problems with it; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00471.html (7,739 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Question about 283 vs. 350 (score: 1): Author: "Rob Lowe" <rllowe@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 23:12:12 -0400; I have a 350 w/HEI in my 56 stepside and had no problems cooling. My truck had a 265 originally. I have since replaced the radiator with one from Obsolete out of Nashville GA. I replaced it because t; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00472.html (9,164 bytes)
4. RE: [oletrucks] Question about 283 vs. 350 (score: 1): Author: sheldon <sheldon@ssmachine.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:33:58 -0700; Don't know about the air conditioning, but I ran a 350 w/4bbl holly for a long time, the only time I had temp problems was sitting in traffic on hot days (the fan was about 6" from the radiator with; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00498.html (8,660 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Question about 283 vs. 350 (score: 1): Author: CyrusR@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 22:31:26 EDT; to enough Gary, I think you're right about the 302. Also, the local machine shop told me that I could bore the 283 out to 0.125" (also giving it a 4" bore), use STD 302 pistons, and have a 302 that w; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00503.html (8,497 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Question about 283 vs. 350 (score: 1): Author: CyrusR@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 22:34:45 EDT; was 2 not radiator Shane, My truck was an original V8, so I'm sure the radiator would cool the 283 OK, but I'm not sure about the 350. Randy Randy Underwood CyrusR@aol.com Springdale, AR ‘57 1/2 Ton; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00504.html (8,365 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Question about 283 vs. 350 (score: 1): Author: BMORRI1@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 23:35:26 EDT; The 283 crank won't work in the 350 block because of the smaller main journals. You are right that the 283 crank in a 4" bore block makes a high-reving 302, but you have to use a 4" bore 327 block th; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00507.html (8,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]