Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+RE\:\s+s\-10\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+RE\:\s+s\-10\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] RE: s-10 (score: 1): Author: "Richards, Troy" <trichards@hrgreen.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:39:00 -0600; I have mixed feelings about the S10. I loved my first S10, a bare bones std cab 1988 model. It got me all over the east coast while in the Army. I sold it when I moved back to Iowa and a couple years; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00205.html (8,189 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] RE: s-10 (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:49:00 -0800; I've never owned an S-10 or any other mini-truck, so I won't get into that part of this. Mark you risked some hot responses recently when you suggested using a Toyota. Have you done this, or seen a t; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00209.html (9,106 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] RE: s-10 (score: 1): Author: Mask1966@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:27:18 EST; I got rid of my '97 S-10 and replaced it with a '65 C-10 as my daily driver. The S-10 had weird electrical problems, the A/C was poor, overheated for at times no apparent reason, and was generally no; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00247.html (8,161 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] RE: s-10 (score: 1): Author: "Old GMC Pickup" <truxrme@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:23:58 -0600; I bet you spend more time at the gas pump though! I to I got rid of my '97 S-10 and replaced it with a '65 C-10 as my daily driver. The S-10 had weird electrical problems, the A/C was poor, overheate; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00250.html (8,701 bytes)
5. RE: [oletrucks] RE: s-10 (score: 1): Author: "Richards, Troy" <trichards@hrgreen.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:57:41 -0600; For my peace of mind getting rid of the S10 was well worth it. Currently my daily driver is a '66 FJ40 Land Cruiser with a small block chevy and NV4500 trans. Gas milage isn't much worse than the S-1; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00262.html (9,042 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] RE: s-10 (score: 1): Author: "Bobby D Keeland" <bob_keeland@usgs.gov>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 07:42:57 -0600; We also had a 1988 S-10. It now belongs to our daughter. That was the very best vehicle buy I've ever made. It has been through a lot, hauled many heavy loads, over 200,000 miles before we replaced t; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00287.html (10,143 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] RE: s-10 (score: 1): Author: wayne osborne <wayne@chevytrucks.org>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 23:49:09 -0500; I must agree--I got a 2 door 85-s10 blazer with the 2.8L v-6. I got it and was told i'd be replacing the engines rear seal as it was prone to leaking. Well--approaching 200K miles and never did anyth; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00294.html (10,744 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] RE: s-10 (score: 1): Author: "laurieandmike" <lauriecorbett@ns.sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:21:34 -0400; will i have a 85 s10 and a 89 best thing i ever had tough as nails leaking. the bones I to oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00297.html (11,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]