Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Re\:\s+Side\s+Mount\s+Spare\s+Tire\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Re\:\s+Side\s+Mount\s+Spare\s+Tire\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Re: Side Mount Spare Tire (score: 1): Author: Dave Quirt <quirt@sk.sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 23:06:36 -0600; Note that my Canadian 1/2-ton is definitely a '52. My father-in-law's 1-ton is definitely a '53. As I said earlier, both have it on the right and my 1/2-ton does NOT have a fender indent. [Of course; /html/oletrucks/2000-04/msg00457.html (8,457 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Re: Side Mount Spare Tire (score: 1): Author: Tom3600@webtv.net; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 07:56:22 -0400 (EDT); I think it might be a Canadian truck thing .... I had one other report like yours from Canada. It might be that it was not a factory side mount too. It seems that all righthand mounts have no fender; /html/oletrucks/2000-04/msg00460.html (7,738 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Re: Side Mount Spare Tire (score: 1): Author: "Deve Krehbiel" <deve@wwwebservice.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 07:43:05 -0500; The canadians were just smarter. I find when standing around shooting the crap, a lot of us sit on the running board (generally on the drivers side). You cant do that with the tire mounted there. Did; /html/oletrucks/2000-04/msg00461.html (9,263 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Re: Side Mount Spare Tire (score: 1): Author: Tom3600@webtv.net; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:21:06 -0400 (EDT); Could it be that the 3600 models '47-'52 had the right side spare tire mount as a factory option? I see that your '49 3600 is on that side...and isn't that original? Also in the book "Great American; /html/oletrucks/2000-04/msg00462.html (7,745 bytes)
5. RE: [oletrucks] Re: Side Mount Spare Tire (score: 1): Author: "Nelson, Jeff - DTC" <jnelson@paducah.k12.ky.us>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 08:33:17 -0500; I can't comment on the Canadian models that some people have mentioned, but, based on official Chevy documentation, I have to go along with Bob Adler on this, the side mount spare tire carrier was no; /html/oletrucks/2000-04/msg00463.html (8,913 bytes)
6. RE: [oletrucks] Re: Side Mount Spare Tire (score: 1): Author: Tom3600@webtv.net; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:54:45 -0400 (EDT); --WebTV-Mail-30887-2636 Jeff - I agree with you on the '53+ models but we are still trying to figure out why some apparently stock 3600 trucks have a left side mount spare tire. Tom Poterack '49 Chev; /html/oletrucks/2000-04/msg00465.html (10,337 bytes)
7. RE: [oletrucks] Re: Side Mount Spare Tire (score: 1): Author: "Nelson, Jeff - DTC" <jnelson@paducah.k12.ky.us>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:16:21 -0500; Purely a guess, but I could see owners of 53 and earlier trucks asking their dealers to install a side mount spare tire carrier (which the dealer certainly could have ordered from the factory) after; /html/oletrucks/2000-04/msg00470.html (8,804 bytes)
8. [oletrucks] Re: Side Mount Spare Tire (score: 1): Author: Dave Quirt <quirt@sk.sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:17:50 -0600; Makes sense. My truck has its original drivetrain, but it was someones daily/weekly driver up until the early '90s, so it could have had the carrier installed anytime from its '52 production date up; /html/oletrucks/2000-04/msg00524.html (8,315 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]