- 1. [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: soundex@eden.com (craig k)
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 22:56:52 -0600
- this is not a political List. I don't waste your time with my political leanings; DON'T waste mine!!!!!! craig caretaker of stephanie's 50 3104 216 5-window deluxe oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and G
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00786.html (7,565 bytes)
- 2. Re: [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: rjj0msj@ix.netcom.com (Rob, Margie, Nick & Andrea)
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 16:28:41 GMT
- Craig, As the founder of this list, I believe I have the right to say that anything that affects our hobby, be it political or not, is well within the group's purview, and as such, is appropriate - a
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00804.html (9,331 bytes)
- 3. Re: [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:09:34 -0500
- I personally feel that there probably is no more relevant and important than clunker laws to this list. I'm sure we can all agree we wouldn't want to be told we can't drive our trucks. I think Miq's
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00809.html (10,502 bytes)
- 4. Re: [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Wyse <chieffan@interl.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 16:18:06 -0600
- Well said Rob, I'm not all that crazy about political talk on our list either(like Craig), but this case is different as it does directly effect our hobby and the loves of our lives (well one of them
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00814.html (10,471 bytes)
- 5. Re: [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: Mushgilday@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 17:46:22 EST
- For some of us, these old trucks are our daily driver and not just a hobby. The possibility of some dunderheaded politico dictating how I get to work each day is cause enough to dial the ACLU for so
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00815.html (8,001 bytes)
- 6. Re: [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: "D. SLANEY" <ppm@dlcwest.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 18:11:19 -0600
- If it's a pollution thing.. I wonder if any consideration is given as to how much pollution the automakers, airlines, army, navy , airforce, steel-makers and on and on, do to this planet compared to
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00817.html (9,326 bytes)
- 7. Re: [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: steve bougeno <sbougeno@inlink.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 23:47:40 -0600
- I am relatively new to the group, when I subscribed to it it was to learn more about the hobby and old trucks in general, and I have learned quite a bit from the members. BUT I fail to see what being
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00821.html (10,290 bytes)
- 8. RE: [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Burt <tburt@hirose.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 08:47:32 -0800
- I say we tie 'em to our oletruck bumper an' drag 'em across a field of freshly-cut hay stubble! Weenies that persist on attacking minorities such as classic vehicle owners for reasons of environental
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00828.html (8,983 bytes)
- 9. [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: The La Fountaine Family <georgelafo@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 17:33:46 -0800
- Then use mine twice Miq!! All The Best George La Fountaine Grandpa's 1954 Chevy 3104 Restoring to Original! oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00893.html (8,376 bytes)
- 10. RE: [oletrucks] Re: vote this or that (score: 1)
- Author: "Schorn, Tim" <SchornT@ci.fort-worth.tx.us>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:50:19 -0600
- Craig, it still sounds like some people, George included, are still misunderstaning the point you made concerning party preference. Sometimes it's easy to think we understand what someone was saying
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00895.html (9,371 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu