Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Stance\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Stance\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Stance? (score: 1): Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:04:42 -0700; I have a question! The stance of our existing frame is a little too extreme for me. We have a 4.5" drop from rear to front. I expect the rear to drop a little with the bed and bumper added on, but no; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00381.html (7,074 bytes)
2. RE: [oletrucks] Stance? (score: 1): Author: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:30:15 -0500; If the rear end is stock configuration (axle UNDER springs) lowering blocks become raising blocks. Not helpful in your case. I have a question! The stance of our existing frame is a little too extrem; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00385.html (7,642 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Stance? (score: 1): Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:39:23 -0700; My bad folks. I forgot to include details. 59 chev step. TCI M2 IFS up front and TCI leafs in rear (spring UNDER axle). Sorry for any confusion. TIA, - Ryan On 7/17/03 1:23 PM, "JOE GARCIA" <joegarci; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00386.html (8,235 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]