Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+TF\s+Identification\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+TF\s+Identification\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: Tom Burt <tburt@hirose.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 08:28:40 -0700; I went to the bank last week in my '57 3200 stepside Chevy. I pulled in head first and walked in. When coming out, I met an old friend. We talked a little and I motioned to my latest truck. All you c; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00367.html (7,945 bytes)
2. RE: [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: Bill Simmeth <bill@merchantsoft.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:32:34 -0400; If I'm not mistaken, 1957 was the first year for the longer bed on the 3200. So, if your friend noticed the elongated bed and the increased gap between the cab and fender he could tell it was at leas; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00372.html (9,055 bytes)
3. RE: [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: MIKE RAHL <MRAHL@martinmartin.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:23:21 -0600; 1955 was the first year for the 1/2 ton long bed (3200). I have a 56 3200. I'm pretty sure that the rear fenders on all the TF trucks (and even thru 1966) are the same. Perhaps he noticed the emblem; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00373.html (10,094 bytes)
4. RE: [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: Tom Burt <tburt@hirose.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:10:22 -0700; Up to '66? Hmmm. Never realized that fender style went that far. No. All the guy could see was from the rear axle to bumper. He didn't see me come in because he was inside the building. Besides that; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00376.html (10,604 bytes)
5. RE: [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: Bill Simmeth <bill@merchantsoft.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 14:23:40 -0400; I do realize that the 3200 existed in 55 and 56, but I believe that they came with 89 inch beds. In 1957, the 3200 bed was increased to 97 inches and this produced a more distinctive "overhang" at t; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00377.html (11,198 bytes)
6. RE: [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: "McNulty, Bob" <BMCNULTY@csuchico.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:45:39 -0700; I have a little literature posted at the url below for 55 2nd series. click on page 1 to see the blown up specs. the short beds were 78 1/8" long bed 1/2 and 3/4 ton were 90" and the 1 ton was 108 1/; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00378.html (10,323 bytes)
7. RE: [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: MIKE RAHL <MRAHL@martinmartin.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:52:26 -0600; My understanding was that the 1/2 ton long bed (3200) had the same length bed as the 3/4 ton's (3600) standard bed, and that the 97 inch bed (distinctive overhang) was available on the 3600, 3800 et; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00379.html (12,844 bytes)
8. RE: [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: Tom Burt <tburt@hirose.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 16:30:20 -0700; My bed is 97 inches, and yes, there is a distinctive overhang. Tom B. '57 Stepside 3200 Mike: I do realize that the 3200 existed in 55 and 56, but I believe that they came with 89 inch beds. In 1957; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00387.html (11,553 bytes)
9. RE: [oletrucks] TF Identification (score: 1): Author: MIKE RAHL <MRAHL@martinmartin.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 06:49:01 -0600; Bill cleared this up for me. The 55-56 3200 bed length was 90 inches and the 57-59 3200 bed was 97 inches. The 97 inch bed makes more sense to me since you can fit a 4x8 sheet of plywood (or whateve; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00454.html (13,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]