Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+suspensions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+suspensions\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: Bill & Pam Whittaker <whittakers@erinet.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 18:50:34 -0400; The ongoing discussion surrounding the virtues of IFS made me think (and that's dangerous) that maybe a broader discussion of all the options is in order. The following are my personal observations a; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00144.html (15,417 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: "Pete" <p.hagan2@home.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 03:28:58 -0400; Well what a bit of thought! Thanks Bill!!! I am truly curious and having just started my 58 project I decided to create an informal survey on front ends. I will be doing some type of IFS but being th; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00151.html (18,640 bytes)
3. RE: [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: "Tom" <tomntam@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 11:34:09 -0400; Would the Mustang ll front end lower the height of my truck and if so, is there any way I can mount the Mustang front end and keep the height of my truck? I have a 55 2nd 3100 and still in the decisi; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00154.html (16,302 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: "joe" <chevy1@jps.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 16:32:47 -0700; First you need to speak with the vendor who's Mustang II crossmember your planning to purchase to find out what the installed height will be with a similar engine and tranny combination to see if it; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00164.html (19,212 bytes)
5. RE: [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: "Bobby D Keeland" <bob_keeland@usgs.gov>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:57:56 -0500; I heard of one guy who bought an IFS that was not supposed to lower his truck any and it ended up lowering it by about 4 or 5 inches. Not a nice thing to see after the fact. I'm sticking with a stra; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00185.html (18,381 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: "A.B." <bigfred@unm.edu>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:34:52 -0600 (MDT); Interesting... but parts are readily available at any FLAPS for the Pacer front end. oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00186.html (17,176 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: Roger.Gleason@uconn.edu; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:11:00 -0400; There is another option and that is the use of a mid 70's Chevy PU front end and crossmember assy that is only bolted onto the frame. Its an inch wider so you have to use two 1/2" spacers on each sid; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00190.html (18,043 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: Roger.Gleason@uconn.edu; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:24:35 -0400; Sorry I erred! I forgot that the steering box is mounted on the extended frame and must be cut off the donor truck in order to get it in the proper relationship with the other suspension geometry. On; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00191.html (8,751 bytes)
9. RE: [oletrucks] Thoughts on suspensions (score: 1): Author: "Armijo, Manuel L" <manuel.l.armijo@intel.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:25:17 -0700; I did the same thing after reading through your website...thanks! There is another option and that is the use of a mid 70's Chevy PU front end and crossmember assy that is only bolted onto the frame.; /html/oletrucks/2001-08/msg00214.html (18,514 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]