Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+What\s+About\s+A\s+Ford\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+What\s+About\s+A\s+Ford\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: Hudson29@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 21:08:35 EDT; For those of us that are pondering the powerplant choices available for our oletrucks, the small block Chevy V-8 has a lot to recommend it. It is one of history's great designs, combining light weigh; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00029.html (9,691 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: MIKE RAHL <MRAHL@martinmartin.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:36:34 -0600; You're a bit of a rabble-rouser, I like that. The Ford small block is 2" narrower than a Chevy small block which would probably solve some exhaust to steering box problems. The Ford is an inch longe; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00040.html (10,967 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: Passnb4U@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 15:35:14 EDT; << Paul, You're a bit of a rabble-rouser, I like that. The Ford small block is 2" narrower than a Chevy small block which would probably solve some exhaust to steering box problems. The Ford is an in; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00043.html (8,581 bytes)
4. RE: [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: MIKE RAHL <MRAHL@martinmartin.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 15:02:11 -0600; I think you may have misunderstood me a bit. The motor which is going in my 46 is going to be a GM 292 inline 6. The motor that was in this truck when I bought it 22 years ago was a 55 235 and not t; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00048.html (10,087 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: Passnb4U@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 17:55:52 EDT; << Mike, I think you may have misunderstood me a bit. The motor which is going in my 46 is going to be a GM 292 inline 6. The motor that was in this truck when I bought it 22 years ago was a 55 235 a; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00051.html (8,970 bytes)
6. RE: [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: MIKE RAHL <MRAHL@martinmartin.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 16:05:45 -0600; - Mike, Actually I was just "jesting" with Paul a bit, and by mistake had highlighted your reply. Mike oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00052.html (7,432 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: "william moldenhauer" <wmh678@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 17:55:04 -0500; hey Paul has jack(Daniel's) been talking to you again? bill 53-3600 hot rod --Original Message-- From: Hudson29@aol.com <Hudson29@aol.com> To: oletrucks@autox.team.net <oletrucks@autox.team.net> Date; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00055.html (10,675 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: jelerath@us.ibm.com; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 11:03:37 -0600; I had a 1963 Buick Skylark with an aluminum block 215 ci v8. It was definitely small and unbelievably light weight. I have no idea of its dimentions but with a 4bbl it ran great. Jon Elerath jelerath; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00070.html (11,486 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] What About A Ford? (score: 1): Author: "Keith" <kvdurand@mail.esc4.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 12:02:35 -0700; My '56 came with a 289. The PO (actually, about three owners back) had put an entire Ford drivetrain in. I think Ford swaps are uncommon because parts are more expensive. I have now replaced it with; /html/oletrucks/1999-09/msg00092.html (7,653 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]