Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+hydramatic\s+trans\s+linkage\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+hydramatic\s+trans\s+linkage\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] hydramatic trans linkage? (score: 1): Author: VIDEOEIC@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 19:34:54 EST; Hi ,does anyone have the hydra-matic linkage for a 55 2nd ser. with a 265. Also, is it worth puting this trans back in?, How were they? Right now I have a 350 w/ a 350 trans. But I also have the 265; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00710.html (6,977 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] hydramatic trans linkage? (score: 1): Author: CLLLSLS@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 22:06:19 EST; I've got a '53 GMC W/Hydra-matic. I've never driven in it, but I wanted to know what these trannies were like also. I've talked with people that have experience with 'em and everything I've been tol; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00716.html (7,320 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] hydramatic trans linkage? (score: 1): Author: Advdesign1@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 06:42:21 EST; GM put this tranny in Cadillac and Oldsmobile. Rolls Royce bought them also. I believe Ford also bought them for Lincoln a few years. These trannys got some good endorsements from high places. Bob A; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00727.html (7,132 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] hydramatic trans linkage? (score: 1): Author: dcvjrv@flashcom.net; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 08:01:08 -0500; I had my '58 GMC Hydramatic rebuilt a couple of months ago and it is very expensive. They charged $400 for labor, which I think is about the going price to work on any automatic. It also cost me $500; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00729.html (8,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]