Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+ifs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+ifs\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: zigga50@att.net; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:16:54 +0000; I was looking at buying a rebuild kit for the front suspension on the 73-87 chevy and was wondering the pros and cons of polygraphite kits compared to origanal rubber kits I would prefer a smooth rid; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00354.html (6,378 bytes)
2. [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: mark <ccpanel@jps.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:12:54 -0800; what IFS will get me a stock or slightly lowered ride hieght? i dont want to camaro clip it. i want an IFS i can order. simple srpings and when placed will give me sotck hieght. also-what one carries; /html/oletrucks/2003-03/msg00375.html (6,645 bytes)
3. [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: "Rick Kellum" <redbulldog@cablelynx.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:29:36 -0600; I have a 73 donor truck...would it be a good candidate for a 57 TF? Rick oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00253.html (6,535 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <Steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:34:56 -0800; The things I've read about using the pickup IFS say its great for an AD truck, but that the TF frame is too wide. However, I have no personal experience with it. oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00255.html (7,072 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: Bob Fischer <r.fischerjr@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 07:43:05 -0800; Hi Steve, We have a 49 3100 with a 77 GMC (Chevy) 1/2 t front saddle under it. I don't know the width of the TF frame rails but the 73-87 saddles have a 29.5 " gap the frame drops into. The other con; /html/oletrucks/2003-01/msg00256.html (7,601 bytes)
6. [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: "Don Simmons" <tasimmons@cbnn.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:03:48 -0700; Since I haven't read anything on IFS for awhile it must be safe to bring it up again :-). Just FYI (anyone interested), Street Truck magazine is building a 59 Dodge Town Wagon(Suburban) and Jim Meyer; /html/oletrucks/2000-10/msg00385.html (6,607 bytes)
7. [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: NV2QIC4U@aol.com; Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 11:38:08 EDT; I don't post much, just sit back and listen -- However I have a '59 Apache 1/2Step that I have been building the last two years and is getting close to that time -- It has the Heidt IFS which I found; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00270.html (7,978 bytes)
8. [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: "Richard Reul" <rreul@cin.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 12:21:45 -0500; I know this list is for our ideas, experiences, and questions, but as for the ifs I think we've covered it. I for one would like to see this old horse quit being whipped , put in the barn and get on; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00490.html (7,675 bytes)
9. RE: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: Whittaker Bill G Civ ASC/SMY <Bill.Whittaker@wpafb.af.mil>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 14:37:56 -0400; I am beginning to agree with you. Mainly because I'm starting to run out of different ways to state my position. ;-) Bill Whittaker '53 3100 Hemi Built Like A Rock With Mopar Stock I know this list i; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00495.html (8,391 bytes)
10. RE: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: "A.B." <bigfred@unm.edu>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:19:02 -0600 (MDT); I really enjoyed the debate. I think that's what resources like this group are about. We need to be able to discuss different ideas. Besides, the discussion has totally stayed on topic (old trucks w; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00498.html (9,107 bytes)
11. RE: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: Whittaker Bill G Civ ASC/SMY <Bill.Whittaker@wpafb.af.mil>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:24:09 -0400; Debates are a good thing just as long as everyone understands that you're not always going to be able to convince everyone that their position is the right one. If everyone remembers that it winds u; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00501.html (9,717 bytes)
12. Re: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: "G. Simmons" <gls@4link.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:19:52 -0700; I quite enjoyed the ifs discussion and hope that it continues in any direction in which it may naturally develop . Together with engine swaps, this has got to be one of the most fundamentally interes; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00503.html (9,704 bytes)
13. Re: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: Allen Coblentz <wac8019@erinet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:21:13 -0400; AMEN! This was interesting for the first 10 or 12 posts, but it's getting a little old. Everyone is entitled to his opinion, and it makes for good debate....but nobody is changing anyboby elses opini; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00509.html (8,669 bytes)
14. Re: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: "Don Simmons" <tasimmons@cbnn.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:07:00 -0700; I definately learned that one!!! :-) Don Simmons -- Original Message -- From: "Whittaker Bill G Civ ASC/SMY" <Bill.Whittaker@wpafb.af.mil> To: "'A.B.'" <bigfred@unm.edu>; "Whittaker Bill G Civ ASC/SM; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00517.html (10,670 bytes)
15. Re: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: "Jack Halton" <safesix@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 10:16:11 -0400; I say keep the IFS debate going, it has been very informative (and it has spawned a thread on beam axles). Maybe nobody has has their opinions changed, but at least we are hearing some good arguments; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00529.html (9,863 bytes)
16. RE: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: "Tibbers" <tibbers@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 07:20:21 -0700; I agree with you on the debate issue. It is good, healthy and a prime example of why this list is so good......there are likely to be some folks reading the thread and NOT posting who are learning a; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00530.html (10,690 bytes)
17. Re: [oletrucks] ifs (score: 1): Author: Allen Coblentz <wac8019@erinet.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:19:59 -0400; I agree the debates can be informative, as I said I was interested in the first 10 to 12 posts. But then it seemed as though it just turned into a "yes it is"/"no it ain't" /..." is so"/ "is not" arg; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00541.html (10,780 bytes)
18. [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: "Claude" <cramey@dashlink.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 18:20:09 -0500; I was looking someday to convert to IFS but am undecided. I hate to chop off the front of the frame for all the reasons stated previously. But, while I like the thought of keeping the frame intact an; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00592.html (12,796 bytes)
19. Re: [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: "Steve Bobst" <mailman@netins.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 18:47:41 -0500; I guess this wouldn't be a good time to mention that I have a couple of front clips (front steer Nova and 71 Monte) that I am offering free to anyone that wants to come and pick them up, or the crush; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00593.html (13,991 bytes)
20. Re: [oletrucks] IFS (score: 1): Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 21:33:12 -0400; I'm still using my straight axle, I drive it all over, and yes it does rides like a truck. I do use an after market sway bar, radial tires and it handles very well. Just drove it to Bennington, Vt sh; /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00596.html (14,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]