Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+miq\'s\s+exhaust\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+miq\'s\s+exhaust\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: Alan Gingles <agingles@nucleus.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:05 -0700; Wally, My exhaust exits in front of the tires as well. I used some cheap Turbo mufflers on it, and the volume isn't that bad. It has a really nice sound when you get on the gas. The only noise concer; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00360.html (8,282 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: "dave riffel" <cafe_dave@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 16:26:58 PDT; Mine also exit in front of the rear wheels, have cheap turbos and noise is definitely not an issue. They are too quiet, I think. I'm thinking of eventually running them straiht out the back with som; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00362.html (8,937 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: "Jimmy Whitley" <doodle@flintemc.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:15:17 -0400; I have mine exiting in front of the wheel also. Mine is too noisy I have headers with 2 1/2"pipe and 2 chamber flow masters. I am going to run mine out the rear. Jimmy doodle@flintemc.net http://memb; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00364.html (9,939 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: jelerath@us.ibm.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 18:34:54 -0600; I have a '53 w/ 327 (10.5:1 compression), stock rams-horn manifolds, dual exhaust with basic "Midas type" mufflers. They exit before the wheels and just make a nice warm purr. Not real noisy but you; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00365.html (9,480 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: "jack halton" <safesix@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 22:24:36 -0400; There's a big difference in a dual exhaust V8 and a 6 cylinder with headers or split manifold. My '51 GMC with Nicson headers on a 302 inline 6 is capable of awesome sound. I have changed exhaust set; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00368.html (10,455 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: miq@teleport.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:25:11 -0700 (PDT); I guess with all this discussion on my exhaust I should offer some details on it. I have original Fenton exhaust manifolds, not the new reproductions. From the down pipes I have 18" resonators, then; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00371.html (8,106 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: Lane495@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 08:09:00 EDT; OK, I have a silly question. On my '86 pickup, I ran the exhaust out the back. I was told later not to drive with the slide-by windows open, or I would asphyxiate myself. On the '56 Sedan Delivery, t; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00377.html (7,613 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: The Swinging Alligator In The Swamp <monadnoc@crystal-mtn.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 11:04:14 -0400; Thanks to everyone for the input on the exhaust. The great thing about this list is you can get several opinions and then in boils down to doing what you think is best for your own situation. But it; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00385.html (7,888 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] miq's exhaust (score: 1): Author: David G Shier <dshier@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:04:58 -0600; We are doing a stock 216 with dual Smitty's right now for a drive-around-town truck and I can't wait to hear it. The pipes are going all the way back to the rear of the truck. Dave Shier www.mtntown.; /html/oletrucks/1999-10/msg00386.html (11,256 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]