Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+rear\s+end\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+rear\s+end\s+question\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Larry Cornett" <larry@cornett.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:30:41 -0800; Can someone please tell me what my rear end ratio is if it take 2.05 turns of the drive shaft to turn the rear wheel one full revolution? Larry -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AV; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00196.html (6,920 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Kerwin M Lehmann" <klehmann@bentonrea.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:33:17 -0800; This could easily be a 4.11 if the opposite wheel was not allowed to turn. oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00197.html (7,580 bytes)
3. RE: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:07:20 -0600; If only one rear wheel is turning it is 4.10 or 4.11 (2.05x2) depending if you are a Ford, Mopar or GM person. If both rear wheels make 1 turn then the ration is 2.05, which is not likely. Can someon; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00199.html (7,650 bytes)
4. [oletrucks] Rear end question (score: 1): Author: carcooley@webtv.net (Carl Cooley); Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 20:07:26 -0400 (EDT); I am in the market for a different rearend for my 51 GMC 1/2 ton pickup. It has a H-033 rear axile. I found a gentleman at a swap meet today who has a junkyard, who says he has a 51 1/2 ton panel tru; /html/oletrucks/2002-09/msg00002.html (6,946 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 18:51:18 -0700; Near as I can tell, looking at my manual, the panel will have the same rear as the pickup. My manual seems pretty clear that underneath the panel is the same as the pickup (except the fuel tank and s; /html/oletrucks/2002-09/msg00005.html (7,725 bytes)
6. [oletrucks] Rear End Question (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Jones" <rockyjones@prodigy.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:05:32 -0600; I have located a possible 3.72 rear end for my stock > ton 1953 GMC. The donor is a > ton GMC Vandura van with VIN GE305-U111431 and model number 36305. I can t easily get under the van so I was ho; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00277.html (6,697 bytes)
7. [oletrucks] Rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Pat Muccigrosso" <yarddogdoctor@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:33:43 -0400; I can appreciate the question on the 6 lug rear replacement because I'm looking at the same situation. If I keep the truck stock I reduce the drivability - if I upgrade the suspension - What kind of; /html/oletrucks/2001-10/msg00334.html (7,278 bytes)
8. [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: MLayton324@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:30:19 EST; hey guys getting ready to change the ring and pinion in my 50 3100 has the original rear end i know that patricks sells the 3.55 and i heard that smeone else has a 3.37 is patricks the best one to us; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00111.html (7,666 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: TORODRVR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:55:15 EST; << i know that patricks sells the 3.55 and i heard that smeone else has a 3.37 is patricks the best one to use or have any of you had luck anywhere else? thanks >> I haven't seen anybody offer the 3.; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00112.html (7,962 bytes)
10. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Allen Jones" <jonesal@u.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 08:19:28 -0800; You are correct (re 3.55 vs. 3.37). Patrick has the 3.55s made in bulk and then whole sales them to everyone else (like Chevy Duty, Carter's, etc.). I think you'll find everyone (including Patrick) i; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00115.html (8,902 bytes)
11. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 13:02:34 -0500; Besides a Inliner discount and the fact that Patrick is the one who had these ring and pinions made I've found him to be one of the best vendors to do business with. Grant oletrucks is devoted to Che; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00118.html (8,321 bytes)
12. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: David G Shier <dshier@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:01:48 -0700; We need to do something like this on our 50 and are awaiting the results of this Dave Shier www.mtntown.com oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00125.html (8,265 bytes)
13. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: David G Shier <dshier@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:07:45 -0700; Dave Shier www.mtntown.com oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00126.html (8,630 bytes)
14. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Jack Halton" <safesix@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 22:51:21 -0500; Patrick's warranty says it all: "If you're not happy with it, I own it". And he has proved it on numerous occasions. There are still people that do business the old fashioned way. Jack / Winter Park; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00127.html (9,468 bytes)
15. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: ldfinley@juno.com; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 23:23:18 -0600; Does Patricks have a web site? I'm always on the lookout for a good Thanks! Larry '51 Chevy 3100 Deluxe Cab OKC OK -- On Wed, 05 Jan 2000 13:02:34 -0500 Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com> writes: YOU; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00129.html (9,150 bytes)
16. Re: [oletrucks] rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Jack Halton" <safesix@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 07:13:40 -0500; No web site but E-mail is patstrks@aol.com -- Original Message -- From: <ldfinley@juno.com> To: <trks@javanet.com> Cc: <MLayton324@aol.com>; <OLETRUCKS@autox.team.net> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 200; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00130.html (10,010 bytes)
17. [oletrucks] Rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Charles Culver" <sculver@iwl.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:00:05 -0800; I put a 4.10 in my '50 3600, and am quite happy with it. Now I'd like to so something similar to the '56 3600. Patrick's has some really good rear end equipment, but they specify only 1/2 ton. Does t; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00506.html (8,117 bytes)
18. RE: [oletrucks] Rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin D. Pennell" <oletwuk@fastrus.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:24:24 -0500; Hi all, Figured that I'd let you know that we really did survive the "Millennium Evolution", though we didn't stay locked in the truck for the scheduled time... (The dog passed gas and the air scrubb; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00518.html (10,864 bytes)
19. RE: [oletrucks] Rear end question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin D. Pennell" <oletwuk@fastrus.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:01:55 -0500; Hi Grant, Well, here goes... Bear in mind that I am NOT the axle guru here!! Trust me!! There are several different rear axles you'll run across. The "corporate" is kind of like the generic GM axle.; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00524.html (11,601 bytes)
20. [oletrucks] Rear end question (score: 1): Author: Edward Miller <edngael@open.org>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:54:09 -0800; Hi Grant and Kevin P., I'm not an axle guru either, but I do have a half ton and had to replace the pumpkin and one axle. Kevin, you got almost everything right as far as I could tell, talking about; /html/oletrucks/2000-01/msg00536.html (8,819 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]