Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+rear\s+end\s+ratios\s+\(again\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul W. Franchina" <pfoxtrot@gate.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:51:47 -0500
I pulled the rear end for clean/fix up. When I got the rear cover off I counted teeth. No cavities, er, um, wait - 39 on the ring - 10 on the pinion - 3.90:1. Was this a stock ratio for 58' or has so
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00494.html (7,818 bytes)

2. Re: [oletrucks] Rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Lake" <lakek@oit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:32:23 -0800
That's the gears that my truck has. I haven't driven it yet, so I can't tell you if they would be good on the highway, but they should be great in town. Kevin Lake 56 napco/burb GMC -- the oletrucks
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00501.html (8,428 bytes)

3. Re: [oletrucks] Rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Allen <thomasa@halcyon.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:39:22 -0800
Does anyone know what year it was that Chevrolet changed from 5.14 ratio to a numerically lower ratio (e.g. 4.56) and what the ratio is. I know they used the same axle up to '72 on the 1-ton. If I kn
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00504.html (7,661 bytes)

4. Re: [oletrucks] Rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:30:58 -0500
That's the standard ratio for Task Force trucks. OD option used 4.10. It's not so great for highway driving. Grant 50 3100 oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00505.html (8,148 bytes)

5. Re: [oletrucks] Rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: "jack halton" <safesix@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:24:13 -0500
Paul this was stock for '58. It is all right for errands around town, to the dump etc but limits highway use to about 50 MPH before the motor is uncomfortable. oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM tr
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00512.html (8,450 bytes)

6. RE: [oletrucks] Rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: sheldon <sheldon@ssmachine.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:31:04 -0800
That's also the ratio I have in 3 rear ends and 1 front end (did they make anything else?) As far as town and highway driving.... what kind of engine? A nicely built 327, balanced and such 3.90 is gr
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00518.html (9,170 bytes)

7. RE: [oletrucks] Rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: Tom Burt <tburt@hirose.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 17:00:16 -0800
My '57 must be similar in ratio. Screams at 65 MPH (3,500 RPM). Gas gauge moves faster than the speedo! Tom B. 57 Stepside 3200 Paul this was stock for '58. It is all right for errands around town, t
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00520.html (8,825 bytes)

8. Re: [oletrucks] Rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Bobst" <mailman@netins.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:21:49 -0600
In the task force trucks, the 1 tons(3800) had 5.14 gears and the 3/4 tons(3600) had the 4.56 gears. The third members are interchangable. Steve --Original Message-- From: Thomas Allen <thomasa@halcy
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00522.html (8,268 bytes)

9. [oletrucks] rear end ratios (again) (score: 1)
Author: Edward Miller <edngael@open.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:07:35 -0800
A way I found around that problem is changing to 16" wheels (from some modernish 1/2 ton Chevy 4 WD) and 235's; the extra diameter of the tires puts me at about 60 mph when the speedo reads 50. But I
/html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00585.html (7,856 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu