Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[spitfire\-enthusiast\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Spitfire\s+engine\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[spitfire\-enthusiast\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Spitfire\s+engine\s+performance\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [spitfire-enthusiast] Re: New Spitfire engine performance (score: 1): Author: "Ptegler" <ptegler@gouldfo.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 09:31:36 -0400; Originally this message was only going to go to you (Jeff) but since you've seen fit to cry in public, and you comments and criticisms went out in public, everyone deserves to know that your attitude; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00206.html (12,740 bytes)
2. Re: [spitfire-enthusiast] Re: New Spitfire engine performance (score: 1): Author: Bradley D Richardson <bradrichardson@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:48:38 -0700; I for one am IMPRESSED. Brad == On Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:43:37 -0700 "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com> writes: Paul Tegler is not to blame for my earlier rant and I owe him an apology. I'd also like to e; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00215.html (19,505 bytes)
3. Re: [spitfire-enthusiast] Re: New Spitfire engine performance (score: 1): Author: BrYarboro@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 18:56:09 EDT; I agree. Also, Calum, I downloaded the info from Jeff's site and I'm thrilled to see such a knowledgable summary. Thank you. Brian; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00231.html (6,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]