Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*02\-03\s+mustang\s+GT\.\.\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*02\-03\s+mustang\s+GT\.\.\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. 02-03 mustang GT..? (score: 1): Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:37:39 -0800 (PST); anyone have one of these with an automatic? Was car shopping for my wife the other day, she's always liked mustangs.. so we hop into a brand new GT convertible automatic (she doesn't know how to driv; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00239.html (8,242 bytes)
2. Re: 02-03 mustang GT..? (score: 1): Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:39:25 -0500; First question: Did you know that the car has traction control and the default is "On"? We own a 97 GT automatic which has a LOT less power and torque in its 4.6 V8 than my 2001 GT has. Assuming wha; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00243.html (10,343 bytes)
3. Re: 02-03 mustang GT..? (score: 1): Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:43:07 -0800 (PST); yeah, first thing i switched off. started in D the first time, then realized that it was starting in 2nd gear not first... so next light i threw it down into "1" and romped on it. Better, but not imp; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00244.html (10,750 bytes)
4. Re: 02-03 mustang GT..? (score: 1): Author: "Brian Berryhill" <bikepoet@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:03:36 -0600; I've driven a 1999 Mustang GT 5sp and it definitely had the torque, but it didn't seem *that* fast, even with 260hp. It did feel much faster than the lower hp 5-sp Stangs I've driven. I have seen so; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00254.html (8,566 bytes)
5. Re: 02-03 mustang GT..? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:01:05 -0500; stick. Be aware that the '97 is a 220hp car, while the '01 is a 260hp car. In '99 Ford revised the 2v 4.6L engine. Add to that, the Auto/Stick difference, and I bet it does feel different. Convertib; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00262.html (9,141 bytes)
6. Re: 02-03 mustang GT..? (score: 1): Author: Tommy Regan <tommy_regan@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:12:15 -0800 (PST); (Resending 'cause I didn't see it post) Well, the later model modular cars ('99+) are solid 14.1-14.3 @ 96-99 mph cars in the 1/4....with a stick. That's plenty respectable, but hardly what I'd consi; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00268.html (8,449 bytes)
7. Re: 02-03 mustang GT..? (score: 1): Author: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:15:44 -0500; Mike, What is interesting, since I frequently drive both the 97 automatic and the 01 stick on the same day, is that in real world driving the lower HP slush box is much easier to drive quickly in tra; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00269.html (8,345 bytes)
8. Re: 02-03 mustang GT..? (score: 1): Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:19:53 -0800 (PST); my wife just thinks they look cool and wanted to drive it around town... most likely very slowly and timidly, and would probably go to the body shop at least once due to a wayward mailbox or tree, bu; /html/autox/2003-01/msg00273.html (9,157 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]