Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\.5\"\s+SUs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\.5\"\s+SUs\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: David Christman <dpc@ai.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 20:42:49 -0500 (EST); I have been reading some literature that mentions using 1.5" SUs on modified A-series engines. Would the carbs on a 71 MGB be suitable? Thanks.; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00253.html (7,573 bytes)
2. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 09:19:48 EST; Yes, but not the manifolds or the needles - a 1.5 SU is a 1.5 SU whatever it comes off. But, I have heard that generally you will get better results using a single 1.75 carb. Daniel 1312; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00259.html (7,671 bytes)
3. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Martyn Ridley <ridleymj@bis.on.ca>; Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 12:38:36 -0500; Twins are better than singles. Whether you need 1.5s is the question. I would suggest you invest in a 'Vizard' book and the Haynes SU book. Together they will give you an idea. Martyn (Ported 948, ri; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00261.html (8,613 bytes)
4. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 15:14:08 EST; Hi Martyn, I do not agree that twins are better than singles. What matters is the amount of airflow the engine receives (and requires) and with carbs the amount of air the carb can flow be it a large; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00265.html (9,377 bytes)
5. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Martyn Ridley <ridleymj@bis.on.ca>; Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 20:12:37 -0500; By the way, what are you using as an exhaust? Cheers, Martyn amount air you twin single SU It's the going, not the getting there, that's good. (Harry Chapin - Greyhound); /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00271.html (10,690 bytes)
6. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Scott & Glenda Meyers <autox@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 09:19:25 -0700; FWIW, there are intrinsic performance characteristics to each setup that must be considered for each application. My perspective is SCCA Solo II (or autocross, etc.). This hobby closely approximates; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00278.html (9,639 bytes)
7. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: "Geoff Branch" <branch@valinet.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 08:08:18 -0500; Were the comments re: Weber 45 DCOE for a 1500?? I'd love to hear what anyboy else is running in a 45 on a 1275. I have 34 Main venturi, 35 aux vent., 125-F2 main jets, 50-F9 idle jets. Any comments?; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00305.html (10,485 bytes)
8. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:28:08 -0800; You might like to compare jetting for Webers on the following URL http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~mg/cars/goblins/tech/webers.htm Mike Although manual single sucked; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00315.html (11,547 bytes)
9. RE: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: "Hanna, Mark" <mhanna@ball.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:06:39 -0700; Hi All , I've been reading this thread with great interest . I will be building a 1275 cc for my Bugeye . The car will be a weekend toy for "SPRIGHTLY" driving on the mountain roads around home . I w; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00329.html (13,112 bytes)
10. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: "Ron Soave" <redlotus@spacey.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 16:13:38 -0500; Loving my 45DCOE. Especially the Weber growl. --; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00332.html (8,034 bytes)
11. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: David Christman <dpc@ai.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 16:40:55 -0500 (EST); I was just looking at dyno charts in Vizard's book. The results were (don't recall what engine, 1275 or bored 1400) that the Weber 45 was best above 5000 rpm and the 1.75 SU was better below 5000 rpm; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00334.html (8,599 bytes)
12. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:55:07 EST; If you have access to a chassis dyno and are prepared to pay for time on it, I would go for the DCOE. There is probably not much to choose from the two and it does appear to be personal preference an; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00367.html (8,084 bytes)
13. Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:54:39 EST; I agree with all of this except I have not heard about the throttle shaft problems. HIF6 on a suitable manifold in the UK will go for Ł35 secondhand (used). Although I am a die hard DCOE convert th; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00369.html (7,875 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]