Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\.5\s+MILLIONTH\s+MG\s+IS\s+A\s+GOLDEN\s+JUBILEE\s+SPECIAL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\.5\s+MILLIONTH\s+MG\s+IS\s+A\s+GOLDEN\s+JUBILEE\s+SPECIAL\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:52:57 +0930; Just a little more news :-) And just think - you have one of those cars! MG Rover announces today (16 April), the building of the 1.5 millionth MG car since production began in 1924. Over its 78-year; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00433.html (8,229 bytes)
2. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Rick Brown <mgrick@mgcars.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:27:11 -0400; Has anyone found a picture of the 1.5 Millionth car? Rick -- http://www.mgcars.org.uk/mgcouncil -- http://mywebpages.comcast.net/brown409/ -- http://www.geocities.com/enymgaclub /// or try http://www; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00443.html (9,326 bytes)
3. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 07:00:30 -0400; Yup Rick, there is one here (along with the new ugly-ass Ferrari): http://www.pistonheads.com/news/ Kai /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00444.html (8,399 bytes)
4. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 07:38:19 -0400; That's out of date today, so now it's: http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?date=17+Apr+2002+12%3A16 Interestingly, the MG piece is entitled "1.5 million of the good, the bad, and the ugly". I; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00446.html (9,678 bytes)
5. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:41:00 -0700; The last line should read: MGB roadster & GT 1962-1980 513,276 -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one with chrome wires /// or try http://www.team.ne; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00456.html (8,510 bytes)
6. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: <ptegler@gouldfo.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:05:28 -0400; what happened to the TD's? ( ...not listed in the chart at all) Paul Tegler ptegler@gouldfo.com www.teglerizer.com The last line should read: MGB roadster & GT 1962-1980 513,276 -- Max Heim '66 MGB G; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00461.html (9,096 bytes)
7. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:40:33 -0700; The list only goes back to 1962. The "TF" you're seeing is the brand new TF, not the classic one... so no TC, no MGA, no R-Type, no "auld speckled 'un"... -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're nea; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00464.html (9,804 bytes)
8. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:49:08 -0400; Obviously there was stuff before MGB, so that's why they had it entitled "Modern MGs".. nothing before '62 listed. Of course, if you add it all up, it's 869,035, of which 513,276 were the 'B', so pre; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00465.html (9,868 bytes)
9. RE: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: "Phil Vanner" <phil@outtech.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:31:53 -0500; NO mention of Midgets or 1100's? It's not even complete for the post-62 Phil Vanner pre-62 Midget --Original Message-- From: owner-mgs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-mgs@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Tab; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00467.html (10,027 bytes)
10. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:43:23 -0600; what happened to the TD's? ( ...not listed in the chart at all) <<<snip>>> There were 101,000 MGAs whereas there were about 30,000 TDs. How come were omitting them? /// or try http://www.team.net/cg; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00468.html (9,242 bytes)
11. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Robert.Haigney@anixter.com; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:02:47 -0700; What about the midgets.....???? Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.co To: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net> m> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL owner-mgs@autox. team.net 04/18/20; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00469.html (12,348 bytes)
12. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:49:31 -0600; Obviously there was stuff before MGB, so that's why they had it entitled "Modern MGs" <<<snip>>> When the MGA came it it was "First of a New Line" and auto mags called it a "modern" MG. It had a str; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00470.html (9,737 bytes)
13. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:03:51 -0400; Hey, don't shoot the messenger. I totally agree. :) I don't know what they lumped together, or if they left something out by mistake or intentionally. They sure took the time to break out certain mod; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00471.html (9,590 bytes)
14. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:10:46 -0700; Damned good question... what ABOUT the Midgets? Certainly they are "modern" enough to make the list. And it can't be the Austin-Healey origin that is the problem -- none of those later cars are pure; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00479.html (9,748 bytes)
15. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <budkrueger@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:45:33 -0400; And why they'd 'recycle' the name TF. Bud Krueger 52TD /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00487.html (10,088 bytes)
16. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Rocky Frisco <rock@rocky-frisco.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:46:22 -0500; And the TC's and (old) TF's and MGA's. -Rock http://www.rocky-frisco.com -- Red Dirt Rangers (Rocky on piano): http://www.reddirtrangers.com JJ Cale Live (w/Rocky): http://www.rocky-frisco.com/caleli; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00496.html (9,719 bytes)
17. RE: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: ckotting@core.com; Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:47:57 +0000 (US/Eastern); [demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text] All I can guess is either: The PR flacks who put the "factoid" together are ignorant. - or - They excluded the "Modern Midget" be; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00514.html (10,049 bytes)
18. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 09:59:00 -0500; I gotta go with the former. The Metro was badge engineered. The other two 80s cars, I'm not sure. And pretty much the ZT, ZS and ZR are just redone Rovers. Still want a ZT-T. Paul. -- Paul T. Root E/; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00517.html (10,846 bytes)
19. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:48:04 +0100; Drivel, but MG Rover are so sensitive about the image of the Metro/Maestro/Montego they rubbish them themselves. They were all built to the original 1920's concept of an MG - based on an existing ca; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00521.html (10,550 bytes)
20. Re: 1.5 MILLIONTH MG IS A GOLDEN JUBILEE SPECIAL (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 11:02:48 -0500; I think that was the point I was making. They re-engineer other cars, with no budget, that gets slashed, and turn out something better. MG started by improving Morris cars, right? What I was trying t; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00522.html (11,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]