Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\.65\s+roller\s+rockers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\.65\s+roller\s+rockers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. 1.65 roller rockers (score: 1): Author: Lizirbydavis@cs.com; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:44:03 EST; Has anyone had any problems with valve clearance or stock double springs binding using a GP2 cam with 1.65 roller rockers? My head is about 9.5:1 Is there any significant performance advantage with t; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00214.html (6,515 bytes)
2. RE: 1.65 roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:30:43 -0800; You will need to do some measuring to determine for sure, but I suspect you will be fine. I recommend that you upgrade your springs to the PI springs (available from Moss). The only downside to high; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00232.html (8,867 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]