Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\s+3\/4\"\s+SU\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\s+3\/4\"\s+SU\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 01:29:35 +0930; Can anyone who has gone up a size in SU carbs on an MGB (in my case 1968) let me know the result. Good? Bad? Not worth the expense and effort? Why did you do it? Yes, my fuel economy is just too good; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00355.html (7,366 bytes)
2. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:26:42 +0930; OK, so far I have heard nothing BAD about making this 'improvement' to HS6 (and thanks to all who have responded off-list), but then again I haven't heard from Barney, Ed, Larry.... As I have said to; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00386.html (8,853 bytes)
3. re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: scott beavis <sbeavis@solartronanalytical.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:58:08 +0100; I run twin HIF44 1.75" carbs on my 1330cc tuned up mini. It goes very well. Everyone said it wouldn't work but it is fine, and has even been known to give 30mpg. It is something I'd definitely consi; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00390.html (9,314 bytes)
4. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:26:50 -0500; (and thanks to all who have responded off-list), but then again I haven't heard from Barney, Ed, Larry.... What the hell would I know about HS6's? My 1600 hums happily past 7000 rpm running on H4's.; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00402.html (8,425 bytes)
5. RE: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: "Unger, Larry G" <larry.g.unger@lmco.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:19:52 -0400; Doubtful that I'm the Larry that you where referencing, but ... around 145 205 In "theory" the max flow for an 1800cc engine is 178CFM at 5600 RPM ... 110 Cubic Inches x 5600 RPM)/3456 = 178CFM 110 C; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00409.html (7,886 bytes)
6. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:54:18 EDT; Barney, if it is really a street cam, you aren't doing anything at 7000 but making noise and reducing bottom end life! Even the 1600 benefits from the 1 3/4" conversion, though, assuming enough head; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00412.html (8,880 bytes)
7. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:15:08 -0700 (PDT); Interesting point, Bill. I saw an MGC at a show last fall with 3 side-draft Weber-like carbs and I wondered if that wasn't overkill for the street (didn't look like a racer to me). Never saw it enter; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00414.html (8,054 bytes)
8. RE: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: "Unger, Larry G" <larry.g.unger@lmco.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:21:09 -0400; Doubtful that I'm the Larry that you where referencing, but ... flows around 145CFM, and the 1.75" carb around 205CFM. In "theory" the max flow for an 1800cc engine is 178CFM at 5600 RPM ... (110 Cub; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00415.html (9,132 bytes)
9. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:28:47 EDT; I also have seen a triple Weber MGC on a chromed 'show' car. My MGC has triple 1 3/4" SUs, which IMO is adequate for street use as well as most competition. It has raised the top end to around 130 mp; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00416.html (8,343 bytes)
10. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:16:57 +0930; Thanks again to all for your comments. Hey, I just wanted to drag out some of that renown list passion by pushing hard for your thoughts - I have gained a lot from the conversations on this so far. I; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00430.html (8,747 bytes)
11. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: "WCAMEYER" <WCAMEYER@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:08:02 -0700; What needles are you using in your HS6's? My setup is losing power at about 4-4500 rpm on a worn engine, and I wonder if the needles could be the problem. Foot to the floor, it really sputters and d; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00432.html (7,695 bytes)
12. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:33:17 -0500; made a big difference, and it breaths better now than ever, lots of fun to thrash around. but making noise and reducing bottom end life! Tell that to all the guys staring at my FTDI trophies. 8) For; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00438.html (8,167 bytes)
13. Re: 1 3/4" SU (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:50:14 EDT; I stand by what I said. Your power is dropping above 6000 rpm. If you don't already have a CR gear box, spend the bucks - it will let you keep it near the torque peak without thrashing the poor thing; /html/mgs/2001-07/msg00442.html (7,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]