Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\s+hour\s+turnaround\s+time\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\s+hour\s+turnaround\s+time\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Pittwood <MPittwood@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:17:08 -0400; Russell and List Perhaps it would be too simple to say that for FIA regs with 1 hour turnaround you create a working team of the right size to do all that is on your check list? Thrust SSC achieved t; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00324.html (9,252 bytes)
2. RE: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:08:53 -0500; once again I have to put on the "egalitarian" mantle: to "create a working team of the right size to do all that is on your check list" (as you say) suggests that the rider/ driver must have EITHER.; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00381.html (9,313 bytes)
3. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 05:52:55 -0400; For the wind correction wouldn't you have to have a least 50 sensors along the track and then have to know what the wind was while the car was actually at that point and also know that the car did no; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00387.html (10,504 bytes)
4. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:05:17 -0500; If you plan the 1 hour turn around, you can do it without a large crew or a lot of money. I did it and so did many others before the "more relaxed" system we have today was in place. It took a bit m; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00388.html (10,356 bytes)
5. RE: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: Ralph Forsythe <rf-list@centerone.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:06:47 -0600; This would be good except that it doesn't take aerodynamics into the equation. 15mph of wind resistance to one vehicle is not the same as 15mph of wind resistance to another. I think if this involve; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00390.html (10,081 bytes)
6. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 16:13:49 -0700; I ran when we used the one hour turn around and I had no problem. We ran just after dawn and there was no wind to speak of. Maybe at other times wind was a concern but not on the few times I got to m; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00396.html (9,328 bytes)
7. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:00:28 -0700; I hadn't thought about it during this discussion, but we did have a 1 hour time limit to service your vehicle. It is amazing what can be done in one hour, however. In those days, the position I fill; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00408.html (10,689 bytes)
8. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 08:35:28 -0700; It seems to me there is some confusion regarding the turn around times. At speedweek the cars are impounded under security over night until they make the return runs the next morning. This is for BNI; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00418.html (9,433 bytes)
9. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:34:29 -0500; I'm not confused.......maybe I confused somebody else and if so, I'm sorry about that.......I just think that the "old" record system is best. I still would like to see it put back in force for Spee; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00419.html (9,698 bytes)
10. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:48:50 EDT; << I remember, during that hour of time, Al Thayer changed a piston that he burned on the down run. He returned, gaining a 200.897 Record and 200 MPH Club Membership. >> Hi Tom Nice accomplishment! B; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00425.html (8,790 bytes)
11. RE: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 00:31:46 -0500; I agree w/ Ralph-- his response is the definitive argument against measuring windspeed and adding or subtracting from the reported speed: The effect of windspeed (on trap speed) will vary with the C; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00430.html (11,249 bytes)
12. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:13:55 -0700; Nothing that I know of. Tom /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00432.html (8,940 bytes)
13. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:32:11 -0400; Personally I would rather have the 1 hour if it is in the late afternoon.. It 'seems'like the salt is better then than the morning anyway.. I always think think of the early am runs as 'uphill' as th; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00433.html (9,372 bytes)
14. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:04:44 -0700; When we ran both ways in the morning after a previous day's qualifying, very often, the average record speed was higher than the qualifying run. One in particular that I remember was Bob Joenick's (; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00434.html (8,906 bytes)
15. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:03:10 -0500; That certainly happened when I was crewing for Clark Cagle and Belmont Sanchez in the eeeaaaarrrrly 60's. The we added some nitro and the air and wet salt was not any longer a problem....just ran ou; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00435.html (9,347 bytes)
16. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:32:27 -0700; Yes, the sun brings the water up and the wind drys it. Traction is better in the early morning, there is usually less chance of wind, and a tuner that understands his motor and the atmosphere is goi; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00436.html (10,603 bytes)
17. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:37:29 -0700; Glenn & Skip, Clark Cagle was one of my favorite people. He always had an opinion which he was not reluctant to voice. His motors ran hard and had a very distinctive sound. Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/G; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00437.html (9,070 bytes)
18. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:15:42 -0700; Tom & Skip The chrys. that Clark last ran are now in the hands of Bob Sykes sr. and son Jeff and in the highboy that Jeff built. A great place for them to continue on. Glen -- Original Message -- Fro; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00441.html (9,653 bytes)
19. Re: 1 hour turnaround time (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:12:39 -0700; Yes I know, Clark gave Bob all his stuff. The problem is that Bob is not in very good health, he is battling cancer. Jeff ran the car this year, without dad to tune, and had some major engine proble; /html/land-speed/2003-04/msg00442.html (8,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]