- 1. Re: 100-6 50th vs 3000 50th NOW - YOU CHOOSE (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Dzwig <pdzwig@summaventures.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:30:04 +0100
- Kirk - and others, it appears, in part due to work conducted by members of this group, that what we know and love as the 3000 Mk 1 was originally envisaged by BMC as an upgrade for the 100-6 to 2.9/3
- /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00017.html (9,400 bytes)
- 2. RE: 100-6 50th vs 3000 50th NOW - YOU CHOOSE (score: 1)
- Author: John Sims <ahbn6@optonline.net>
- Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:58:14 -0400
- Just bears out what I have heard for heard from Geoff Healey and others that the plant men put things on the cars that were within an arms reach which makes our involvement frustrating and wonderful.
- /html/healeys/2006-10/msg00019.html (8,010 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu