Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1098\s+rebuild\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1098\s+rebuild\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Andy Webster" <trunkie@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:09:49 GMT; Hi Mike and others, I've decided to go with Link Automotive for my rebuild. Naturally, its going to end up a bit more expensive than hoped, at $800, but considering that KG engineering quoted me $220; /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00775.html (8,694 bytes)
2. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:15:21 -0500; Rods reconditioned & shot peened? Balanced? Head work? WST -- Original Message -- From: Andy Webster <trunkie@hotmail.com> To: <mikeg@vicnet.net.au> Cc: <spridgets@autox.team.net> Sent: Wednesday, A; /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00777.html (9,872 bytes)
3. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT); Definitely what WST said, especially balancing. If you have any reason to suspect block/head are not perfect, have them magnafluxed. Valve guides, springs, surface head. Of course, freeze plugs and t; /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00779.html (10,509 bytes)
4. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Andy Webster" <trunkie@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 16:43:42 GMT; Don't forget the effect of the p!$$weak australian dollar! But , right you are, the retail cost of the rings is ~$170....while a set of pistons with rings is ~$220. I considered it but the pistons I; /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00781.html (10,135 bytes)
5. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Robert Duquette" <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:43:20 -0400; I've never had my shot peened !! How does that work? Robert D. --Original Message--; /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00804.html (9,887 bytes)
6. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 10:19:35 +1000; You'll need new rod bearings too. You should get the cam bearings pressed in by Brian. I'm not sure of that cam grind, but Brian knows those engine so well, I'd be happy with his advice. You can get; /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00807.html (10,351 bytes)
7. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: JustBrits@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 21:16:10 EDT; << How does that work? >> (G*d, I wish this reply could be on aol for the effects I coud add!!!) VERY carefully, Robert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LOL Ed; /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00814.html (7,336 bytes)
8. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: HFC <froggi@cdsnet.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 22:42:35 -0700; ...could hurt! WFO; /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00837.html (10,669 bytes)
9. 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:37:03 -0700; Hello spridgets, ok, here's your chance.. and mine. i am taking my engine (now residing in the trunk of a ford tempo) to Paul A. for to be rebuilt... my primary interests are reliability and driveabi; /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg00915.html (7,457 bytes)
10. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:57:58 EDT; First, which block do you have? there were two basic 1098 blocks, the 10cc and the 10cg. As I remember, the 10cc was the one to use. The 10cg could not stand anymore than mild tuning. This was probab; /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg01068.html (7,109 bytes)
11. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:40:59 -0400 (EDT); Wasn't the early 1098 the cc and the later wider width bearing model the cg? Cap'n. Bob '61 :{); /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg01075.html (6,985 bytes)
12. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:01:58 -0700; Other way around, Cap'n! 10CC is the later one with the 2" main bearings. Everything else being equal, the 10CC engine produced about 4 HP more because of the stiffer crank. Regards, Paul A; /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg01077.html (7,344 bytes)
13. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:25:28 -0500; == Makes sense, doesn't it, what with the alphabet and all; ergo, no, t'other way round. Peter C I ain't 'ED yet!; /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg01084.html (7,385 bytes)
14. 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:07:41 -0700; Hello spridgets, ah.. good question.. why rebuild a 1098? instead of installing the 1275?... well for one its the original block that came with the car.. not that the car will (at least while I have; /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg01097.html (7,942 bytes)
15. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 07:12:55 EDT; Not really a fair comparison. Bottom line: a stock 1275 will go faster feel smoother, run cooler, last longer, and cost less to rebuild and maintain than a 1098. What are you trying to preserve? Sinc; /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg01102.html (8,549 bytes)
16. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:25:34 -0700; Nonsense... I recently put a 1098 in a Midget and it ran as good or better than many 1275s I've driven. Great acceleration too. They can be good runners too, and many people prefer them. Gerard -- Pl; /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg01118.html (8,131 bytes)
17. Re: 1098 rebuild (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:24:01 -0700; You weren't talking figures... you were making a generalization... "for some one in not too much of a hurry!" (That's what was responding to). That's how I might typify a 948, but not an 1100. (at le; /html/spridgets/2001-07/msg01145.html (8,657 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]