Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1098\s+vs\s+1275\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1098\s+vs\s+1275\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. 1098 vs 1275 (score: 1): Author: jim wright <wrightjg@the-bridge.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 20:03:36 -0800; Thank you all for the information I've received while monitoring "Spridgets" over the past few months. I have a 65 Sprite that will be back on the road. I've been reading the messages back and forth; /html/spridgets/1998-03/msg00174.html (7,596 bytes)
2. Re: 1098 vs 1275 (score: 1): Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 18:44:03 -0800 (PST); Because you would have to use octane boost or race gas, get a bigger radiator and an oil cooler, and wouldn't have as much torque. :-) Where does it say that in the book? I don't believe that you get; /html/spridgets/1998-03/msg00177.html (7,937 bytes)
3. Re: 1098 vs 1275 (score: 1): Author: Les Myer <lmyer@sprynet.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 21:56:30 -0500; 10.5 to 1 compression would be a bit much for pump gas these days (IMHO). The unmodified 1275 would have more torque across the board and would be a lot snappier during everyday driving. Horsepower; /html/spridgets/1998-03/msg00178.html (8,787 bytes)
4. 1098 vs 1275 (score: 1): Author: john.kahoon@pcohio.com (John Kahoon); Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 05:44:00 -0500; by pcohio (NetXpress 2.54.beta3) via UUCP id B69280; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 06:02:27 -0500 In-reply-to: <3324D998.351A@the-bridge.net> Organization: PC-OHIO - bbs.pcohio.com - www.pcohio.com - 216-381-332; /html/spridgets/1998-03/msg00185.html (8,821 bytes)
5. Re: 1098 vs 1275 (score: 1): Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>; Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 08:17:37 -0500; Torque is why the 1275 is better than the 1098, performance-wise. The 1275 has far more power at lower RPM's, which you actually use, than a street-modified 1098. Also, a 1098 is pretty long stroke,; /html/spridgets/1998-03/msg00186.html (8,334 bytes)
6. Re: 1098 vs 1275 (score: 1): Author: TMHEFFRON <TMHEFFRON@aol.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 20:13:38 EST; Dear Crash: Yes, I'd be interested to get a copy of the book. I have a couple of other of Vizards books and have been using them as a general guide, but now I'm at the carb/manifold part and need mor; /html/spridgets/1998-03/msg00222.html (7,693 bytes)
7. Re: 1098 vs 1275 (score: 1): Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>; Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:13:41 -0500; If you're planning to use the car on the street, I'd avoid changing the throat of the carb's at all - while it improves ultimate HP potential, it really screws up low speed and part throttle running.; /html/spridgets/1998-03/msg00247.html (8,814 bytes)
8. Fwd: 1098 vs 1275 (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:17:40 -0600; /html/spridgets/2004-01/msg01334.html (6,973 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]