- 1. 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "Gregory Groiss" <ggroiss@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:23:18 -0500
- Hello Everyone, OK, this may be a stupid question but what are the major physical/mechanical differences between a low and high compression 1275? The engine I rebuilt a few years back for my '73 Midg
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01163.html (6,875 bytes)
- 2. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "K. Valentine" <kevin@valentinephoto.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:36:44 -0500
- Greg, Pistons are the only difference. The "L" engine has (was manufactured with) deeper dish pistons making it a lower compression than the "H". Many of these engines have already been rebuilt in th
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01164.html (7,114 bytes)
- 3. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "Gregory Groiss" <ggroiss@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:02:39 -0500
- Thanks Kevin. The pistons that came with the engine seem to have pretty deep dishes but without a side by side it would be hard to tell (I think). Thanks again, Greg
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01165.html (6,163 bytes)
- 4. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert E. Shlafer" <pilotrob@webtv.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:22:24 GMT
- "Without a side by side it would be hard to tell" Not so, kemosabe. The stock HC pistons for a stock 8.8-1 had a 6.6cc dish. The LC (8.0-1) capacity in this respect would be much greater, most likely
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01184.html (7,017 bytes)
- 5. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: trevorwj@insightbb.com
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:50:57 -0500
- 5cc per teaspoon?
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01187.html (7,361 bytes)
- 6. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert E. Shlafer" <pilotrob@webtv.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:49:01 GMT
- "5cc per teaspoon" Jesus, Trevor!!! Is there a chef or housewife in the audience puleese who can answer this??? :):) Cap'n. Bob '60 :{)
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01223.html (7,537 bytes)
- 7. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "Glen Byrns" <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:57:48 -0800
- More like 15cc per tablespoon. I've got 16cc dish pistons in my 1275. Glen
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01225.html (7,600 bytes)
- 8. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "David Lieb" <dbl@chicagolandmgclub.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:07:52 -0600
- No, the other dude was right. A teaspoon is just under 5cc. If you type in "1 tsp in cc" in Google, it will promptly tell you "1 US teaspoon = 4.92892161 cc" It does many useful conversions and calc
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01226.html (7,724 bytes)
- 9. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert E. Shlafer" <pilotrob@webtv.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:17:30 GMT
- would you happen to recall what static CR the 16cc dished pistons would have given with original bore and combustion chamber capacity? :) Cap'n. Bob '60 :{)
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01227.html (7,477 bytes)
- 10. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert E. Shlafer" <pilotrob@webtv.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:31:15 GMT
- Ah....I see (said the blind man) Trevor was actually telling us, not really asking! Thanx, David. :) Sorry I misinterpreted your message , Trevor. Apologies. Cap'n. Bob '60 :{)
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01228.html (7,519 bytes)
- 11. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:55:28 -0800 (PST)
- Everybody's right. 1 tsp - 5cc, 1 tbsp = 15 cc ____________________________________________________________________________________ Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01232.html (7,901 bytes)
- 12. Re: 1275 L vs. 1275 H (score: 1)
- Author: "David Lieb" <dbl@chicagolandmgclub.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:13:04 -0600
- You right, I missed the tablespoon in his post. Oh well.
- /html/spridgets/2007-01/msg01233.html (7,405 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu